Re: 1v1: Promontory Summit [10.3.14] BETA

Maps that may be nearing the end of production. Finalize maps here, while testing.

Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:42 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:...
Ok, my main concern was that you just understood what I was trying to say lol. It's your map and I understand that if you like it better with the mountains so "hard" looking then I have to suck it up. O:)
I did notice that there are mountainous areas in the Omaha side, they are just more muted. I suppose my suggestion was to try and have both sides looking this "soft" way and see how it looked?

I understand completely what you are saying. :)
Unless i change the background completely which i don't want to do because it will lose the character of the map, we are never going to change the difference between the two maps because they should be joined together side by side rather than off-set as you know. Omaha is always going to look softer (no/less mountains = less dark ridges), and even when i reduce opacity of both maps, the Sacremento side still looks harsher because of the terrain and i don't want to lose that. Sorry FT. :)
If i put a rubber tool at 25% opacity over the Sacremento side it would lose the feel of that side also. I am not prepared to do that because it causes inconsistency in the maps and they have been both sourced from the one original map.
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby Funkyterrance on Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:01 am

cairnswk wrote:I understand completely what you are saying. :)
Unless i change the background completely which i don't want to do because it will lose the character of the map, we are never going to change the difference between the two maps because they should be joined together side by side rather than off-set as you know. Omaha is always going to look softer (no/less mountains = less dark ridges), and even when i reduce opacity of both maps, the Sacremento side still looks harsher because of the terrain and i don't want to lose that. Sorry FT. :)
If i put a rubber tool at 25% opacity over the Sacremento side it would lose the feel of that side also. I am not prepared to do that because it causes inconsistency in the maps and they have been both sourced from the one original map.


Ahh, I see. Well, I suppose that is that then. :D
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Medals: 22
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (3) General Contribution (1)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:41 am

is this last version 8 (made by PS) also focused on gameplay? because I can not see any changes except replacing some of Happiness.

about graphics, each version has something I like, but the last one looks better. what I more like in version 7 is colour of Happiness and better readable names on background.

Oneyed
Sergeant 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [31.12.12] V7-P7 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:40 am

Oneyed wrote:is this last version 8 (made by PS) also focused on gameplay? because I can not see any changes except replacing some of Happiness.
Oneyed

Oneyed, yes even though i have changed the map over to PS, the focus is still on gameplay please.
did you go back and read this post below...i stated:
if we have this, i'd like to have 2 attached to the bombardment, and 2 attached to non-bombardment towns.
so there is a change in gameplay

about graphics, each version has something I like, but the last one looks better. what I more like in version 7 is colour of Happiness and better readable names on background.

Good.


cairnswk wrote:
Oneyed wrote:the Happiness in this version have a less importance. what about to do them more important? I can see any (not complex) possibilities:
1, could they be "added" to Saboteurs only (as have Nexcastle or Freemont) - their importance will be that they give +2 auto, so player can easier secure (or reconquer) Saboteurs after bombarding. maybe in this version Saboteurs would not give +1 autodeploy, so player will realy need happiness?


if we have this, i'd like to have 2 attached to the bombardment, and 2 attached to non-bombardment towns.


2, make them a "must", so player could continue only if he holds station and its happiness.

OK, i could go with that for the attached to bombardment towns.

3, or combination - some could be added to Saboteurs and some to "normal" stations, but here they will be a "must".
maybe a "must" would be only before any easier part of railroad (several n2 in row as you have already in)...

half and half is good, but these have to fit in with scenes that i can find historically and therefore i don't know about your must.

the font is blurry for me too.

please specify where :)

and the railroad is hard visible or it a little blend between frames of western and eastern part.

yeh, graphics issue...let's do gameplay for now eh?
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [31.12.12] V7-P7 Gameplay

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:46 am

cairnswk wrote:if we have this, i'd like to have 2 attached to the bombardment, and 2 attached to non-bombardment towns.
so there is a change in gameplay


yes I see this one as only change in gameplay. so this is as you want to have gameplay?

Oneyed
Sergeant 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [31.12.12] V7-P7 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:53 am

Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:if we have this, i'd like to have 2 attached to the bombardment, and 2 attached to non-bombardment towns.
so there is a change in gameplay


yes I see this one as only change in gameplay. so this is as you want to have gameplay?

Oneyed


Well yes...it is a compromise...we simply have to balance the neutrals
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby koontz1973 on Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:31 am

cairns, clarify for me this point. The yellow territs. Are the bombard points your opponent can hit from there starting position or are they decay or killer neutrals? I only ask as I seem to remember them being killer neutrals at one point.
Sergeant 1st Class koontz1973
Cartography Assistant
Cartography Assistant
 
Posts: 7538
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:57 am
Medals: 116
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (10) General Achievement (13) Clan Achievement (5) Map Contribution (12)
Tournament Contribution (31) General Contribution (9)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:44 am

koontz1973 wrote:cairns, clarify for me this point. The yellow territs. Are the bombard points your opponent can hit from there starting position or are they decay or killer neutrals? I only ask as I seem to remember them being killer neutrals at one point.

NO, they were never killer neutrals otherwise you'd neve be able to achieve the goal of holding the line and spikes.
Always been bombardments from start positions.
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby koontz1973 on Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:55 am

cairnswk wrote:
koontz1973 wrote:cairns, clarify for me this point. The yellow territs. Are the bombard points your opponent can hit from there starting position or are they decay or killer neutrals? I only ask as I seem to remember them being killer neutrals at one point.

NO, they were never killer neutrals otherwise you'd neve be able to achieve the goal of holding the line and spikes.
Always been bombardments from start positions.

Thanks.
Sergeant 1st Class koontz1973
Cartography Assistant
Cartography Assistant
 
Posts: 7538
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:57 am
Medals: 116
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (10) General Achievement (13) Clan Achievement (5) Map Contribution (12)
Tournament Contribution (31) General Contribution (9)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby Funkyterrance on Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:40 pm

I kind of wish there were less bombards. :| One on each side or two max would be plenty I feel?
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Medals: 22
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (3) General Contribution (1)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:57 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:I kind of wish there were less bombards. :| One on each side or two max would be plenty I feel?

FT...on that i am flexible.

How do others feels about reducing the bombardments to 2?
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby isaiah40 on Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:18 pm

cairnswk wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:I kind of wish there were less bombards. :| One on each side or two max would be plenty I feel?

FT...on that i am flexible.

How do others feels about reducing the bombardments to 2?

How about changing a couple of the bombardments to decays? Maybe the Avalanche, workers walk out and the Indian attacks could be the decays? Just a couple of pennies worth.
ImageImage
show: High Score
User avatar
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3957
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm
Location: To be absent from the body is to be present with Christ
Medals: 36
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2) General Achievement (4) Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (6)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:44 pm

isaiah40 wrote:
cairnswk wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:I kind of wish there were less bombards. :| One on each side or two max would be plenty I feel?

FT...on that i am flexible.

How do others feels about reducing the bombardments to 2?

How about changing a couple of the bombardments to decays? Maybe the Avalanche, workers walk out and the Indian attacks could be the decays? Just a couple of pennies worth.


isaiah40. i think that's a marvellous suggestion.
So for CPRR, we'd have Newcastle and 15 tunnels as decays, and i'd have to find another "incident" to add to that, so that would leave only 1 bridge bombardment.
For UPRR, we'd have "slow prorgress" and " indian attacks" (3) as the decays and 1 bridge bombardment.
1 bridge bombardment each side would satisfy FT's suggestions, and isaiah40 gets his decays.
Even i have to clap for those. =D>
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:46 pm

Any chance of the Draft stamp being allocated please. :)
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Re: 1v1:Race to Promontory Summit [2.1.13] V8-P8 Gameplay

Postby Funkyterrance on Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:21 pm

cairnswk wrote:1 bridge bombardment each side would satisfy FT's suggestions, and isaiah40 gets his decays.
Even i have to clap for those. =D>

I think the decays are an excellent suggestion as well!

Didn't mean to bump off cairns' request. He needs a Draft Stamp, Pronto! :P
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Medals: 22
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (3) General Contribution (1)

PreviousNext

Return to Beta Maps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Login