The Bison King wrote:natty_dread wrote:greenoaks wrote:natty_dread wrote:squishyg wrote:CC is an ever-evolving place. It's counter-productive to think that every time a decision is made we should go back and re-do things that were done under old rules. I hear this same argument come up over and over again whenever CC has a new policy. Just move on.
Usually that would be the case. But in a case like this, where the very reason for the policy is to avoid offending either individuals or laws of other countries... doesn't it sort of negate the whole point of the policy if it's not applied universally?
if you are not offended by it why are you pushing for its removal ?
I'm not, per se.
Are you not "not offended"? or not pushing for it's removal?
Users browsing this forum: degaston