Jury Discussion- POLL

[InkL0sed]

Maybe it should work like this:

once the graphics and game play stampers feel like the maps are close to a stamp or should be stamped, a jury should then be called, at the stampers' discretion, that is.

I say at their discretion to leave flexibility for different maps. Some maps may be long overdue for a stamp and clearly don't need any more discussion, while others may be in more of a gray area and require more healthy discussion that a jury would provide, in which case the stampers would want a jury.

[the.killing.44]

once the graphics and game play stampers feel like the maps are close to a stamp or should be stamped, a jury should then be called, at the stampers' discretion, that is.

Agreed, that sounds very good.

And thanks for the promo/shout out Benn

.44

[LED ZEPPELINER]

that sounds like a good idea, but i think that the maker of the map should also have something to do with the jury being called in, not exactly sure how though

[sailorseal]

Can I sticky this thread as it is kind of important discussion involving the foundry?

[the.killing.44]

Can I sticky this thread as it is kind of important discussion involving the foundry?

No, you can't. Only the CAs/Global Mods/Admins can do that.

.44

[GrimReaper.]

NO JURYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[sailorseal]

Can I sticky this thread as it is kind of important discussion involving the foundry?

No, you can't. Only the CAs/Global Mods/Admins can do that.

.44

Your kidding right? Why would I ask permission if I can do it myself!?! I am asking them

NO JURYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And this is why I think it should be stickied

[the.killing.44]

our kidding right? Why would I ask permission if I can do it myself!?! I am asking them

No, you don't understand. You cannot change this thread to a sticky, physically.

.44

[sailorseal]

our kidding right? Why would I ask permission if I can do it myself!?! I am asking them

No, you don't understand. You cannot change this thread to a sticky, physically.

.44

No you don't understand. I mis-phrased my initial request but then when I said "if I could I would" that means I can't

[the.killing.44]

I said "if I could I would" that means I can't

You never said that

Anyway I think this bumps itself quite regularly as not much happens in the Foundry Discussion, somewhat sadly.

.44

[sailorseal]

I said "if I could I would" that means I can't

You never said that

Anyway I think this bumps itself quite regularly as not much happens in the Foundry Discussion, somewhat sadly.

.44

I essentially said that but I agree nothing happens so little posts, things get done but they take forever

[ZeakCytho]

Sailorseal and .44, please stop filling foundry topics with spam. It's annoying to read. Keep it to PMs.

On the issue of whether this should be stickied: no. There's no purpose to it being stickied. It's as important a discussion as everything else in this forum, not more imortant.

As for juries themselves, I am more in agreement with what Ed outlined than anything else. Juries should give a final once-over for the whole map and suggest changes, but should not have the power to force mapmakers to accept these changes. If the gameplay or graphics are horribly flawed, the map should not have those stamps anyway. Ideally, by the time a jury is convened, the map will only have minor, subjective changes left to make, not major important ones.

[sailorseal]

Sailorseal and .44, please stop filling foundry topics with spam. It's annoying to read. Keep it to PMs.

.

We only fill the ones we make and I would keep it to PMs but he blocked me from sending him PMs as a joke

[GrimReaper.]

I REFUSE TON SERVE ON JURY DUTY
'NO JURIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRIKE
STRIKE I SAY

[sailorseal]

I REFUSE TON SERVE ON JURY DUTY
'NO JURIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRIKE
STRIKE I SAY

Why?