Minister Masket wrote:Not exactly the kind of answer we were hoping for really.
what kind of answer were you hoping for then? if you and your son want to vote me for being noncommital on yesterday's lynch and my inactivity then so be it, although a few did not bother voting D2 with similar if not worse levels of activity
jonty125 wrote:A bit of speculation here, but I suspect, KGB, had knowledge of IB's alignment and that's why he was going to unvote immediately after the claim.Not going to vote KGB yet, but I'm tempted, may do if we need L-2.
i can definitively say i had zero knowledge of IB's alignment prior to his claim, i'm not sure why you think i would after i clearly stated i'd be unvoting either way, think about it for a second: if i knew IB's alignment/role, then you must ask yourself, why would i even bother to risk voting him in the first place?
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Interesting. I'll play along, too.
KGB...you can either claim now or risk being hammered as both jonty and I are willing to commit votes to you.
well seeing how it takes 7 to lynch, i'm not sure why i should be concerned by the 2 lannisters random vote casting, even if jonty and neb both vote me, that would still only put me at L3 by my count