Golden Pantheon - Angels and Demons - Endgame

[F1fth]

Fair point, but I would actually advocate against lynching all three of you as well not only because I find the scenario where you're all mafia unlikely, but because I want to focus on the short term here. There's only one lynch ahead of us tonight. Which lynch is the most likely to turn up scum? To me, that's DRoZ and the information from chap gave us is only a reason for voting him, not the reason. I think his bandwagon vote against greg and activity in this game both count against him.

[DRoZ]

Well, in case things go sour for me, I did want to get out a little information I learned last night. I was hoping to hear more about any night activities from sam, but since it doesn't seem that he wishes to say anything, I will say this... I am a watcher, Augustine of Canterbury, last night I watched aage and he was targeted by samgrossy. Earlier today, sam spoke on Jak's vote on aage, perhaps the targeting was a means to set Jak up today, perhaps not. I feared releasing this, should it be that sam's role was a productive one, but lynchings can go quickly so I am putting that out there. Either way it is information. I would also like to point out a few things about myself, back long ago when I played mafia on here, I tended to be a bit post happy, I think this brought a lot of attention my way and I would wind up lynched or night killed early on, which led to quite a bit of frustration and as such, I now try to only make substantial posts, or short posts as a means of clarifying.

[Hensow]

Wilst I find that for the same reason as jak I find violet less lightly to be scum I am not prepare to take it as

Also, one quick note. I would suggest not directly comparing WCs. While it isn't strictly against the rules (I really hate to modkill) I will say that it would be a really bad idea to META it too much.

There also hase been put the question of who should be on the bandwagon if we expect chapcrap to last the night my inclination would be to have it be have it be those that were not on last nights such that we know the number of scum I think it's 12 to lynch and 12 peps including chapcrap who did not lynch greywolf so if we want to lynch one of them we may have to pick someone to be the twelfth (depending on how ??? interacts with chaps power)

[samgrossy]

Well, in case things go sour for me, I did want to get out a little information I learned last night. I was hoping to hear more about any night activities from sam, but since it doesn't seem that he wishes to say anything, I will say this... I am a watcher, Augustine of Canterbury, last night I watched aage and he was targeted by samgrossy. Earlier today, sam spoke on Jak's vote on aage, perhaps the targeting was a means to set Jak up today, perhaps not. I feared releasing this, should it be that sam's role was a productive one, but lynchings can go quickly so I am putting that out there. Either way it is information. I would also like to point out a few things about myself, back long ago when I played mafia on here, I tended to be a bit post happy, I think this brought a lot of attention my way and I would wind up lynched or night killed early on, which led to quite a bit of frustration and as such, I now try to only make substantial posts, or short posts as a means of clarifying.

I will verify that I did visit Aage last night.

What I am confusesd about is that I never heard you ask about my night actions. If you did, it was only in the last day and you didn't give me enough time to respond... although I don't think you ever asked. So why out that I visited Aage, without first coming right out and asking me in the thread about my night action. While I don't think this is necessarily scummy, it just doesn't make any sense.

If you would have asked in thread "Sam, did you visit anyone last night" you just tell me that I did visit someone. This does two things. First, it gives you no info as to whether I tell the truth or not. Next, it gives scum a two targets tonight, a watcher and me. Both of us have non vanilla roles.

Well, so far, my case on Victor stands. I'm going to spend some time soon looking back at the voting patterns of the past few days. We probably can guess that there is not many more than 4 or 5 scum, and it definitely looks like they are trying to force a lynch.

Lastly, let me just say that I hope you realize that 4 or 5 scum seem reasonable. And if you think there are 5, then only one of them didn't vote for Greg D2. So, I would argue to you, that if you think I am trying to "frame Jak" because I am scum, on its merits, it is statistically unlikely that I am scum. I voted Jak on D2 because I truly felt, and still feel, he is scum. Our list of scum should be focused on the people that lynched Greg. The benefit is that if we lynch today we can compare the lynch list and the number of scum to determine who the scum are pretty easily. We just need two lynch days worth of data.

[DRoZ]

I was hoping to hear you discuss, not that I asked, I was just hoping you may have something to say from your night action without me drawing attention to it, as I said before, I did not want to out anything. The only reason I bring it up now is an attempt to ease some of the growing pressure on me. Had I not, then surely I would have remained an attractive lynch option, waiting until votes have built up would have just made my response seem desperate.

As to my bringing up the post about Jak, I was not attempting to build a case on you, I was merely thinking out loud. I agree with the points you have made to this point regarding Victor and Jak and have had no real questions about your townliness.

[aage]

Well, in case things go sour for me, I did want to get out a little information I learned last night. I was hoping to hear more about any night activities from sam, but since it doesn't seem that he wishes to say anything, I will say this... I am a watcher, Augustine of Canterbury, last night I watched aage and he was targeted by samgrossy. Earlier today, sam spoke on Jak's vote on aage, perhaps the targeting was a means to set Jak up today, perhaps not. I feared releasing this, should it be that sam's role was a productive one, but lynchings can go quickly so I am putting that out there. Either way it is information. I would also like to point out a few things about myself, back long ago when I played mafia on here, I tended to be a bit post happy, I think this brought a lot of attention my way and I would wind up lynched or night killed early on, which led to quite a bit of frustration and as such, I now try to only make substantial posts, or short posts as a means of clarifying.

I will verify that I did visit Aage last night.

What I am confusesd about is that I never heard you ask about my night actions. If you did, it was only in the last day and you didn't give me enough time to respond... although I don't think you ever asked. So why out that I visited Aage, without first coming right out and asking me in the thread about my night action. While I don't think this is necessarily scummy, it just doesn't make any sense.

If you would have asked in thread "Sam, did you visit anyone last night" you just tell me that I did visit someone. This does two things. First, it gives you no info as to whether I tell the truth or not. Next, it gives scum a two targets tonight, a watcher and me. Both of us have non vanilla roles.

My guess is that he panicked. I'm not aware of any negative effects that your visit has caused, so it seems okay. I'm curious to what you did do, but I'm not expecting you to tell me.

[aage]

I was hoping to hear you discuss, not that I asked, I was just hoping you may have something to say from your night action without me drawing attention to it, as I said before, I did not want to out anything. The only reason I bring it up now is an attempt to ease some of the growing pressure on me. Had I not, then surely I would have remained an attractive lynch option, waiting until votes have built up would have just made my response seem desperate.

You were hoping to learn something without drawing attention to it... by drawing attention to it? How does that work?

[DRoZ]

I was responding to sams confusion about my not asking him about visiting you. I was hoping that he or you would reference whatever happened last night without my bringing it up. As there seems to be sentiment against me I decided to speak on what I knew. I used past tense to convey my mindset prior to the votes against me. I apologize for not being clear enough for you to follow.

To simplify... 1) I watched you last night and saw that sam targeted you. 2) At the start of the day I followed along hoping one of you would reveal what exchange happened between you last night.(This is the point that I had decided not to draw attention to the targeting) 3) A few people began to question my alignment, so I said what I knew, as I said before, waiting until further animosity built would have made it much more difficult to clear myself. (This is the point I decided to draw attention to the targeting) I am not sure how to make that any more clear.

[vodean]

I was responding to sams confusion about my not asking him about visiting you. I was hoping that he or you would reference whatever happened last night without my bringing it up. As there seems to be sentiment against me I decided to speak on what I knew. I used past tense to convey my mindset prior to the votes against me. I apologize for not being clear enough for you to follow.

To simplify... 1) I watched you last night and saw that sam targeted you. 2) At the start of the day I followed along hoping one of you would reveal what exchange happened between you last night.(This is the point that I had decided not to draw attention to the targeting) 3) A few people began to question my alignment, so I said what I knew, as I said before, waiting until further animosity built would have made it much more difficult to clear myself. (This is the point I decided to draw attention to the targeting) I am not sure how to make that any more clear.

or you are scum, with info about a fellow scum that you are using to try and make us forget about you before we BW you too much

[aage]

lmfao... Okay Vodean, your last three posts.

sounds like it should work out well.

there wasn't (nor isn't) even a plan yet, so I find it interesting that you already know that it will work out.

thats all well and good, but there were FOUR, not THREE anti-town on the BW. so even if you lynch all of us, and we ALL flip anti-town, you are still missing someone... and by then scum has an advantage anyway from the night, since we wont all flip anti-town, and even if we do, there will be some third parties.

Aside from the fact that f1fth said 'those people are most likely to be mafia' rather than 'these are all the scum in the group guys', this is a useless remark.

or you are scum, with info about a fellow scum that you are using to try and make us forget about you before we BW you too much

Yeah... who are you implying to be scum here, me or Sam? If Sam, that'd be very poor teamplay. If me, he could have never known who targeted me especially since I wasn't even aware of it.
FoS.

[jonty125]

I'm going to vote DroZ for his random claim. And also FOS jak, for removing Vio on his list based on how she worded her post, with an element of gut instinct.

[jgordon1111]

I'm going to vote DroZ for his random claim. And also FOS jak, for removing Vio on his list based on how she worded her post, with an element of gut instinct.

Your kidding right? Random claim? Can you clarify what you mean by a random claim? Are you playing tiddlywinks and we dont know it? Are you drunk?
OR ARE YOU SKIMMING and throwing random stupid crap into the mix? Please Explain in detail why you have made that ridiculous vote.

[jonty125]

I'm going to vote DroZ for his random claim. And also FOS jak, for removing Vio on his list based on how she worded her post, with an element of gut instinct.

Your kidding right? Random claim? Can you clarify what you mean by a random claim? Are you playing tiddlywinks and we dont know it? Are you drunk?
OR ARE YOU SKIMMING and throwing random stupid crap into the mix? Please Explain in detail why you have made that ridiculous vote.

Well, he was nowhere near L-2 and he also didn't give much in his defence.

[vodean]

lmfao... Okay Vodean, your last three posts.

sounds like it should work out well.

there wasn't (nor isn't) even a plan yet, so I find it interesting that you already know that it will work out.

thats all well and good, but there were FOUR, not THREE anti-town on the BW. so even if you lynch all of us, and we ALL flip anti-town, you are still missing someone... and by then scum has an advantage anyway from the night, since we wont all flip anti-town, and even if we do, there will be some third parties.

Aside from the fact that f1fth said 'those people are most likely to be mafia' rather than 'these are all the scum in the group guys', this is a useless remark.

or you are scum, with info about a fellow scum that you are using to try and make us forget about you before we BW you too much

Yeah... who are you implying to be scum here, me or Sam? If Sam, that'd be very poor teamplay. If me, he could have never known who targeted me especially since I wasn't even aware of it.
FoS.

you are clearly skimming really badly... that was obviously directed to Droz, and the first one was right after someone posted a plan. The second one was a useless rebuttal to a useless argument.

[jgordon1111]

I'm going to vote DroZ for his random claim. And also FOS jak, for removing Vio on his list based on how she worded her post, with an element of gut instinct.

Your kidding right? Random claim? Can you clarify what you mean by a random claim? Are you playing tiddlywinks and we dont know it? Are you drunk?
OR ARE YOU SKIMMING and throwing random stupid crap into the mix? Please Explain in detail why you have made that ridiculous vote.

Well, he was nowhere near L-2 and he also didn't give much in his defence.

How odd again are you reading what your writing? Unless he and A are scum buddies(likely not)possibly if they are dumb as hell or masterminds.

Have you really read What DroZ said and A basically confirmed? yes he was not saying much in the forum,but saw the possiblity of A BW and cut it off so we could have info and move on maybe to a different target. Probably not the best damn plan considering what his role is,but A has basically confirmed that he did indeed make that visit.

Now that I have hopefully helped you get into the game please read along and stay caught up for the future.

Vote Jonty for two of the weakest posts in this game so far,because he is not paying attention,or he is trying to pull some stupid shit and may be scum hoping no one else is reading and will jump on a BW with him.

HAWK