I agree there should preferably be a lynch on Day 1, but to lynch jonty "just because"? I don't agree with that. There should at least be something resembling a case. Take a look at S7C for instance:
--S7C was the second to vote for jonty. That was the first start of a wagon.
--S7C started the prodding case against me, kind of leading aage in the right direction. "Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicion"
Gustaf Wasa wrote:Hippo hey, no need for sarcasm. Seemed to me too you showed genuine suspicion for Some7hingCLEVER. Usually a joke vote is something like "vote XX for bad taste" etc, not "vote XX for suspect posts".
Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicion
aage wrote: Nebuchadnezer wrote:
thehippo8 wrote:I'm here and I sense that clever is being too clever by half - aghast at the original post - bandwagoning - scared of spiders - head up his ... oops in his hands, ain't no excuses my schimeric friend - where are your handlebars now? Hmmm? vote Clever
How did anyone take this seriously? I guess the "scared of spiders" and "schimeric friend" are pretty damning. It's like Hippo was riding a bike with no handlebars or something...
Anyway, please explain what in this post was "serious"...
The true question is: did anyone?
As far as I know everyone can at this point claim it was all a ruse from the joke vote phase and nobody could dispute it. I never took Hippo's post seriously; it obviously wasn't... but it was
weird and hence my playful response. We don't call them "joke votes
" because they're just remarks though. I don't actually want to see him lynched today.
His response to me was,again weird, though. I don't know why he assumed I was being serious. Still don't want to lynch him though.
--When that fizzled, S7C encouraged a lynch of jonty:
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two
I could of course be wrong. But as a lynch candidate right now, Some7hingCLEVER looks like a better choice than jonty.unvote