DB4Christ wrote:I can only approach this from my perspective. I know I am Townie, so here is how I am looking at it. You who are Townies will have the same perspective. SCUM want to lynch by day, so I am going back to the lynching parties as the only concrete and productive way of identifying SCUM. If a Cop or Watcher reveal something, it will of course change my method. For now:
DB4Christ - archer3base, justplay4fun, Ragot25, qbert68, Gabsensei, Killuminati19, Crasp, DB4Christ, Elsuper bano (Page 20)
Ragot25 - CHECK-M8, TheCrown, Killuminati19, Crasp, mtamburini, TuffyLess, Mithridaties, King Edward 3rd, DB4Christ,Cump (Page 30)
Those in Blue are dead or missing. I must presume SCUM are common to both list. Thoughts fellow Townies?
archer3base wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:a few thoughts:
yes, lots done overnight, BUT I still am no closer at this point to identify Mafia;
so, unless I see compelling reason(s), I see no reason at this time to change my vote....
NO one has pointed out to me why Ragot was lynched; I think some of you were convinced by Mafia to kill an innocent man. I suggest you look at how you were manipulated to vote to lynch an innocent man. There was much discussion from page 25 or so on to change the vote of several of you.
I'd just like to point out that I never changed my vote and of course a pro-townie was lynched. As of now I'm going in the same direction as last time...
DB4Christ wrote:On D1, as TC pointed out, we needed to start somewhere. Ragot was lynched in the end for non participation/evasive behavior. With one of the Towns power roles, he should have been more active and participated. That was his mistake, not ours. We all have a role to play and are expected to participate in finding SCUM. If one of our Townie power roles has anything relevant to bring forth, they should do it now. Otherwise, we need to bring someone else who isn't participating much to the table to answer why. We need to get moving forward with our search Townies!
TheCrown wrote:Here are my thoughts:
#1 suspect = killuminati - he has not talked... probably mafia
#2 suspect = qbert - he gives no reason for vote
#3 suspect = jusplay - he bandwagons with no reason
#4 suspect = Ragot - bandwagon voting
Ready to be suspects = crasp and DB4.
Crasp seems so sure of who is scum... Seems like he trying to convince to lynch. He can't be so sure unless he is scum and knows who is town and mafia, and is trying to throw us off.
DB4 seems overeager and asked for a mass claim. Scummy to me.
Gabsensei - no voted. Suspectish
Akamiro - no talking, nothing of value
archer - doesn't talk much
CHECK - not afraid to vote, although mis-guided, never asked about my crappy football team favorites (Raiders and Rams = sucky)
Cump - unknown, but is participating
czar - doesn't say much
Elsuper - newbie, not saying much
King edward - trying
Mith - may be a townie
mtamb - may be a townie
Scarlet - newbie, unknown
tuffy - helping, maybe a townie
ANY of my thoughts are subject to change when new information emerges.
I for one would like to hear from my suspects list.
mtamburini wrote:DB4Christ wrote:On D1, as TC pointed out, we needed to start somewhere. Ragot was lynched in the end for non participation/evasive behavior. With one of the Towns power roles, he should have been more active and participated. That was his mistake, not ours. We all have a role to play and are expected to participate in finding SCUM. If one of our Townie power roles has anything relevant to bring forth, they should do it now. Otherwise, we need to bring someone else who isn't participating much to the table to answer why. We need to get moving forward with our search Townies!
I know I have stated this previously and Im going to say it again just in case it was not clear as many people have posted similar things to what I have said which in my opinion could be scummy but I am willing to overlook it for now as there has been a lot of filler going on and still some silent people in our town.
Cop should out only if he has a mafia result as we would be 1 less mafia, Im going to assume we have a doctor and moo wouldnt be that cruel to but a cop with no doctor or at the very least a bodyguard.
Now knowing that the crown is missing and we dont really know what kind of role he could be and I dont think any mafia role could make someone "missing". Id like to assume the latter in this case and think he may have been onto something yesterday with his suspect list and one of those people may have targeted him.
Gabsensei wrote:i totaly agree with you and i would love to know more about Czar since he almost never talk or at least since day 2 he havent spoke and so i would love to hear about him a lil bit more and there is qbert too that i would love to hear about
Cump Sherman wrote:I haven't chimed in up to now because I am as confused as most of you. I believe I cast the last vote for Ragot and was convinced it was right when I did it. Even though it took 10 of us, I feel more responsible. Ok, I'll save my speech for the funeral.
I am also reminded that Crasp's last words were about him possibly dying during the night. When he said it, I thought he was just rambling. Now, I'm not so sure. Maybe he knew something and paid the price.
As for TC, I'm leaning toward Gabsensei's explanation.
Qbert - I'm taking you up on your offer but I hope you have something stronger than cocoa. Irish coffee would be nice.
DB4Christ wrote:Lets get more from all of them. Who should we start with....I think JustPlay. Will wait for a consensus though. I agree with the 24hr waiting period.
King Edward 3rd wrote:Elsuper bano wrote:DB4Christ wrote:TC.......Have you ever known me to lie....! If you want to lynch me ...go for it. No powers, but the town just lost a good citizen. That's history repeating itself all over again huh TC. Doughnuts are on me Townies!
Sacrificial Lamb >Unvote Kill - Vote: DB
I don't know why but this seems really suspicious to me
What seems suspicious to me is that this is only your 3rd post & you jump in & vote for someone who is at the top of the list of players to be lynched with no reason why. Your 1st post was a check in & the 2nd was a response to a doughnut comment. Care to explain ? Or are u going to lay low again ? unvote, vote Elsuper bano
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests