Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team, Global Moderators
happyfeet wrote:Symmetry wrote:happyfeet wrote:has anyone pointed out that chap bush and happy all were roommates in college? because i still dont think that flow understands that friends help friends out. even if it is a game against you. i wouldnt want to win a game because someone missed a turn. and yes i would have made this one but i missed atleast 14 games in which i got help.
yes, bush didnt do what flow wanted so flow cashes and kills chap leaving chap a target to green. then, green kills chap and cashes thats what really costed us the game.
I think that Flow has been pointing out exactly that for pretty much this entire thread- that you felt an obligation to help each other win a game and screwed over the neutral player.
and the fact that there are two neutral players not just flow
Symmetry wrote:Seems like you guys have a fairly coordinated degree of cooperation going on even outside of the game, although you're all clanmates save Gordon.
I hope someone neutral looks into this. It seems mighty suspicious at present.

chapcrap wrote:happyfeet wrote:Symmetry wrote:happyfeet wrote:has anyone pointed out that chap bush and happy all were roommates in college? because i still dont think that flow understands that friends help friends out. even if it is a game against you. i wouldnt want to win a game because someone missed a turn. and yes i would have made this one but i missed atleast 14 games in which i got help.
yes, bush didnt do what flow wanted so flow cashes and kills chap leaving chap a target to green. then, green kills chap and cashes thats what really costed us the game.
I think that Flow has been pointing out exactly that for pretty much this entire thread- that you felt an obligation to help each other win a game and screwed over the neutral player.
and the fact that there are two neutral players not just flow
If that was our plan, happyfeet could have just thrown the game himself...Symmetry wrote:Seems like you guys have a fairly coordinated degree of cooperation going on even outside of the game, although you're all clanmates save Gordon.
I hope someone neutral looks into this. It seems mighty suspicious at present.
It's a tournament game. It's not like we planned ahead of time to have this setup. The assignment was random. You aren't even making coherent points here. And bush isn't a clan mate either. Try looking at everything before you post.
Symmetry wrote:chapcrap wrote:happyfeet wrote:Symmetry wrote:happyfeet wrote:has anyone pointed out that chap bush and happy all were roommates in college? because i still dont think that flow understands that friends help friends out. even if it is a game against you. i wouldnt want to win a game because someone missed a turn. and yes i would have made this one but i missed atleast 14 games in which i got help.
yes, bush didnt do what flow wanted so flow cashes and kills chap leaving chap a target to green. then, green kills chap and cashes thats what really costed us the game.
I think that Flow has been pointing out exactly that for pretty much this entire thread- that you felt an obligation to help each other win a game and screwed over the neutral player.
and the fact that there are two neutral players not just flow
If that was our plan, happyfeet could have just thrown the game himself...Symmetry wrote:Seems like you guys have a fairly coordinated degree of cooperation going on even outside of the game, although you're all clanmates save Gordon.
I hope someone neutral looks into this. It seems mighty suspicious at present.
It's a tournament game. It's not like we planned ahead of time to have this setup. The assignment was random. You aren't even making coherent points here. And bush isn't a clan mate either. Try looking at everything before you post.
He's pretty clearly associated, but you're nitpicking at my central point now. You were all tied together, and shouldn't have been involved in the obvious screwing over of a third party.

You guys are missing something here. Had chapcrap not meddled with his opponents turn by soliciting a sitter, Bogota would likely have been taken from red. Flow's turn shows the rest of red was taken with a set trade. Whatever happened afterwards is a mute point. happyfeet's turn was altered due to the intervention of a member of the opposing team.Flow520 wrote:So, I added a link to the picture: Game Board: Round 8. Green's turn. Set at 15.
As requested, here is a screenshot of the board just after I used my set to take out the rest of red. Had the sitter (requested by chapcrap) followed the plan laid out in game chat (deploy 3 on Mexico city and take Bogota) and had it succeeded (which had high probability), then I would have had 6 cards, traded for 15, hit green, and ended turn with 4 cards. Green would not have been able to respond because he only had 2 cards.
happyfeet wrote:and yes i would have made this one
happyfeet wrote:i do admit i probably would have taken the turn different.
happyfeet wrote:four parties at play all neutral to eachother. please read things before posting.
Flow520 wrote:You guys are missing something here. Had chapcrap not meddled with his opponents turn by soliciting a sitter, Bogota would likely have been taken from red. Flow's turn shows the rest of red was taken with a set trade. Whatever happened afterwards is a mute point. happyfeet's turn was altered due to the intervention of a member of the opposing team.Flow520 wrote:As requested, here is a screenshot of the board just after I used my set to take out the rest of red. Had the sitter (requested by chapcrap) followed the plan laid out in game chat (deploy 3 on Mexico city and take Bogota) and had it succeeded (which had high probability), then I would have had 6 cards, traded for 15, hit green, and ended turn with 4 cards. Green would not have been able to respond because he only had 2 cards.happyfeet wrote:and yes i would have made this onehappyfeet wrote:i do admit i probably would have taken the turn different.


Symmetry wrote:happyfeet wrote:four parties at play all neutral to eachother. please read things before posting.
Simply a lie. Apart from the fact that this was a team game, the players involved have admitted to being friends, to being members of the same clan, and to having arrangements to play turns for one another.
So, sorry, I can't accept this particular attempt at BS.

jgordon1111 wrote:LOL what I find amusing right now is that a bunch of actual players have actually more than once explained the way games are played and turns are taken to a troll. Guys please stop attempting to explain the impossible to the troll.
Some of you fought me,when I tried to get him banned from being able to post in the players forums,are you maybe understanding why now.
No input of any value, and has no concept of what he is referring to even.To the point that more than once he needed correcting on what he was talking about lol.
Trolling at its best. speaking to hear its own head rattle.
happyfeet wrote:Symmetry wrote:happyfeet wrote:four parties at play all neutral to eachother. please read things before posting.
Simply a lie. Apart from the fact that this was a team game, the players involved have admitted to being friends, to being members of the same clan, and to having arrangements to play turns for one another.
So, sorry, I can't accept this particular attempt at BS.
you still are off the point flow doesnt think we set him up. he thanks chap meddled were he shouldnt have.
im sitting here thinking who the heck symmetry and how he doesnt even make sense to what is really being talked about. you are trying to add some thing that isnt even in question here.

Kaskavel wrote:I was playing four players doubles once, me and 3 of my friends. But then they left for vacation together and left me their accounts, so I was playing all 4 players of the games. Despite my illusions of being a great strategist, the reality is that I am such a bad player that I could not win for either side. Eventualy I found myself stuck fighting against myself and having a terrible dice. I made many mistakes, no matter what I was trying, I was always failing. I was losing all attacks for both sides no matter what. My dice was always inferior to mine so I could not make progress. I tried to organize our game plan somehow in the chat but I was not cooperative to myself and so I failed. I accepted the fact that I am not such a good player as myself. I am a bad player and so I cannot beat me, because I am a strong player. Realizing the problem, I reported myself to the c&a reports, but then I supported my innocence and I was cleared.

Symmetry wrote:If you took a turn CC, against yourself, then that is a major offense. Levels of honest play don't even come into it.
Nobody should be allowed to play both sides of a game. It's abuse, pure and simple. You're a mod, and generally a fair one, although I can't say we've not disagreed lately, but I hope that your contributions to the site mitigate this, and they don't let you off either.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests