Conquer Club

Accused:

hermey68
vltmoniz




The accused are suspected of:


Conducting Secret Diplomacy





Game number(s):

Game 11804069




Comments: playing on this for 7 rounds when i saw green attack red on 1 terr. on this map "polynessian" that usaully means a battle for position but nothing came. they stayed that was for the next 13 or so rounds, not attacking each other and camping it out together. it got to a point after i had moved out that it was obvious their troops were mixed together. red run into my stak so i attacked him and took him out of his home as he had little troops there. they had both backed both their staks together in defence. i went into the new area and then could see green and red terrs all over twisting around each other.

first red hit me with his stak and then backed of to allow green to get through easily. green also attacked from my rear. i then made a beeline for red to take him out before they got too strong, i managed that but by then green was wiping me out from behind.

I have never seen a more obvious case of secret diplomacy in a game.

Moved to the cry baby forum nothing here !

Just taking a quick look, they've played 5 3 person games on that map together and one of them has won all of them. Looking at the game logs a little, I don't ever see them attacking each other heavily early on but they do attack the 3rd player. I'm not saying there is secret diplomacy, but I'd say he has a right to report it if he feels it's that obvious to him.

jltile1 wrote:Moved to the cry baby forum nothing here !

thats i nice attitude............i have been on CC for a lot of years and cant remember the last time i have bothered too post about something, not exactly what i would call cry baby.

I couldn't care less about losing tbh but in the way that game was played it was obvious what was going on so i just figured it should be raised.

Comments like yours are not of ant use so why bother commenting, you obviously have not looked at it well.

anyhow i just posted for people to make their own decisions and i guess you made yours, i personally think different.

also think how neither one would answer in chat to my accusations....not any proof true but what i saw in the game was certainly enough for me to post.

cooldeals wrote:Just taking a quick look, they've played 5 3 person games on that map together and one of them has won all of them. Looking at the game logs a little, I don't ever see them attacking each other heavily early on but they do attack the 3rd player. I'm not saying there is secret diplomacy, but I'd say he has a right to report it if he feels it's that obvious to him.

Thx for looking.

I'll be honest with you, I don't see any overt Secret Diplomacy, but there is definitely suspicious attack patterns at times. I am going to note this in case it comes up again.

Noted.