Conquer Club

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=178394#p3895905

How do you come up with these conclusions ??

If you have an issue with a ruling, take it up properly. If not, stop posting drivel all over the C&A forums.

deathcomesrippin wrote:If you have an issue with a ruling, take it up properly. If not, stop posting drivel all over the C&A forums.

I am posting what is in the CA reports make your rulings consistent.

Again, consider this a free warning: If you don't like the ruling, then follow the instructions to appeal it. Other than that, stop posting in a case that is closed. Do not post here again, or in any other topic on C&A about this. Keep your posts to the point and pertinent to the case.

My point is about this case don't see abuse here. So what I have to open a CA to disagree with the case? Please explain how I disagree properly in this matter

My point is about this case don't see abuse here. So what I have to open a CA to disagree with the case? Please explain how I disagree properly in this matter

Sorry. Was just going to give this the normal "don't care about that" glance.

But for some reason i took the 2 seconds and looked at this guy's ratings left.
And then clicked on the link that jltile1 post and looked at THAT guy's ratings left.

jl has a fairly valid point here.

Well, extremely valid actually.

I mean, you know... makes sense...

I guess what i'm saying, is what pipe are you hitting that told you the other guy (that left 170 negative ratings and ZERO positive ratings) WASN'T guilty of ratings abuse, and that this guy (after leaving 8 out of 17 ratings that are negative) deserves a warning...

Hell i even took another 30 seconds and looked at some of the games where he left a neg rating. Guess what? i'da left a neg. rating too in AT LEAST 3 of the 8 games where he left a neg. rating...

My favorite thing though was your post of...

deathcomesrippin wrote:If you have an issue with a ruling, Go f*ck yourself. If not, stop posting drivel all over the C&A forums. I dont have to explain shit to you. Now, back to hitting this pipe... *

*note, quote may not be an "exact" quote, but more of a summary

jltile1 wrote:

deathcomesrippin wrote:buddski13 was Warned for Ratings Abuse.

Wow I have seen way worse and not even a noted and you war this guy who only has a few ratings. That is the problem here it all based on you "moods" and not a specific rule or actual action. I don't see five examples in the CA report as you guys ask everyone else for. This is the worst case I have seen and then he gets warned what a joke

actually you are the joke!

jltile1 wrote:My point is about this case don't see abuse here. So what I have to open a CA to disagree with the case? Please explain how I disagree properly in this matter

You appeal the ruling. You post somewhere else.

I dont know what it is about this that is not getting through to everyone, but let me just lay it out again and maybe it will get through. I'll even bold it.

Please do not post anything that is not relevant to the case

In case everyone who posted after I closed the case missed it, this is not a case about me allegedly messing up a Ratings Abuse case. So stop posting this here. If you have an issue with me, I am sure you can find out who to file that complaint with. I warned jl about posting here and now I am warning everyone else. This (C&A forums) is not the place to bring up issues you have with my rulings. PM an admin, start a GD topic, I don't care, I will even contact KA about how you can go about officially complaining about me if you want. as long as you keep it out of the cases. This is not a place for you to come and practice your trolling. I am locking this thread. Keep your posts on subject or keep them out of the C&A forum. Thanks.