Chariot of Fire wrote:He simply shouldn't be considered for team games when KORT
Why your analogy apply only for team games? if site gonna accept your rule proposal, why do not apply that for standard games also? if someone is unable to play, then he is unable regardless of game type (speed game excluded, forgot about that).
Chariot of Fire wrote:"Oh hey, let's put Moonchild in all of Josko's unlimited fort quad games so he can be covered for a majority of his first turns" - because that's exactly what it looks like when you read the stats.
As a contrary we say "He is our member and he deserves to have fun playing in clan wars, what he has done for years while he had internet at house. This is site for fun, and he has fun in doing it. Forbidding him to do it would be take fun out of part time users."
If our statement was what you wrote now, then we would put him in hive unlimited game, not in world 2.1. Hive game has 171 troops to attack/fort in round 1 and w 2.1 has 56 troops to attack/fort in round 1. Obviously, the more strategy is needed to successfully play with 171 troops than successfully play with 56 troops. If our goal was put him in games in order that his turns can be sat by me, then he would be put in hive and not in world 2.1. BUT, he is playing this for fun, not for cheating, so that is why he was just put in his favorite maps which he had played on regular basis both before lack of internet and after lack on internet. He likes this game, he likes those maps, and he has fun playing it by himself. Forbidding that would be taking out fun from him and from any other player in the similar scenario.