Page 1 of 1

Bruski82[noted]SN

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:36 am
by Edric Wolfswift
Accused:

Bruski82

The accused are suspected of:

Intentionally Deadbeating

Game number(s):

Game 11999866

Comments:
Clearly states in chat "2012-11-27 21:39:06 - Bruski82: Hi Edric. Sorry but I mistakenly started a game with you. I will not be playing." I cannot see this as anything but Intentionally Deadbeating.

Re: Bruski82

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:54 pm
by JCR
Edric Wolfswift wrote:Accused:

Bruski82

The accused are suspected of:

Intentionally Deadbeating

Game number(s):

Game 11999866

Comments:
Clearly states in chat "2012-11-27 21:39:06 - Bruski82: Hi Edric. Sorry but I mistakenly started a game with you. I will not be playing." I cannot see this as anything but Intentionally Deadbeating.

added link

its 1v1 and your a premium, its easy points. why is this a big deal?

Re: Bruski82

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:15 pm
by Funkyterrance
JCR wrote:
Edric Wolfswift wrote:Accused:

Bruski82

The accused are suspected of:

Intentionally Deadbeating

Game number(s):

Game 11999866

Comments:
Clearly states in chat "2012-11-27 21:39:06 - Bruski82: Hi Edric. Sorry but I mistakenly started a game with you. I will not be playing." I cannot see this as anything but Intentionally Deadbeating.

added link

its 1v1 and your a premium, its easy points. why is this a big deal?


It's f***ing weak, that's the big deal imho.

Re: Bruski82

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:16 am
by SPARTACUS1974
he has said sorry and it was a mistake to start the game so you file a report? you need to get a life mate this is a total waste of mods time.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:35 am
by Edric Wolfswift
He and his playing buddy blehotsky simply deadbeat every game that includes anyone else. Some may not think it is a big deal but I think any deliberate violation of the rules is.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:16 am
by scoobyzx10r
Edric Wolfswift wrote:He and his playing buddy blehotsky simply deadbeat every game that includes anyone else. Some may not think it is a big deal but I think any deliberate violation of the rules is.



how do you work that out? you are the only game he has played away from his "buddy"(maybe 1 and the same who knows??)

get over it,seems like a lot of moaning for just 1 game,especially as you're the benefactor of it!!!!

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:57 pm
by Funkyterrance
scoobyzx10r wrote:
Edric Wolfswift wrote:He and his playing buddy blehotsky simply deadbeat every game that includes anyone else. Some may not think it is a big deal but I think any deliberate violation of the rules is.



how do you work that out? you are the only game he has played away from his "buddy"(maybe 1 and the same who knows??)

get over it,seems like a lot of moaning for just 1 game,especially as you're the benefactor of it!!!!


Yeah so whether or not he is breaking a rule is unimportant eh? Some people aren't point driven and actually play to have fun. Ever play a game with someone and they just stop trying and proceed to let you win? It's not very fun. The guy should accept responsibility for his mistake and finish his game.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:02 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
People like scoobyzx10r who endorse his behavior are no better than the offender. If rules mean nothing to you then you will be just another name on the Foe list.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:08 pm
by cooldeals
Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:56 pm
by Symmetry
Edric Wolfswift wrote:He and his playing buddy blehotsky simply deadbeat every game that includes anyone else. Some may not think it is a big deal but I think any deliberate violation of the rules is.


This is true, they pretty much only play each other and deadbeat games against other players.

Bruskl has only one game against another player, this one, deadbeated

Blehotsky, the Bruski account opponent, seems to have deadbeated all of his games with a partner other than Bruski.

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=find&submit=Search&p1=blehotsky&so=D

That's kind of dodgy.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:04 pm
by scoobyzx10r
Edric Wolfswift wrote:People like scoobyzx10r who endorse his behavior are no better than the offender. If rules mean nothing to you then you will be just another name on the Foe list.



dont recall endorsing it,just the fact your whinning about a very trivial matter and bolstering the facts to make it seem like it happens a lot.once isn't a lot.

with regard to your foe list,i'd consoder myself special,but i suspect it's a long list and i'd just be 1 of many,still i'm sure i'd get over it.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:51 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.


According to the Community Guidelines this is not a minor infraction...

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:19 am
by jltile1
What is the big deal burn him for giving you the game come on he said he didn't mean to join so he gave you the win... Big deal ???

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:10 am
by aad0906
lol when people give me free points I high five myself

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:51 am
by IcePack
Edric Wolfswift wrote:
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.


According to the Community Guidelines this is not a minor infraction...


You need more than a single infraction. Once can easily be a mistake (as he admits and even apologized for). Pretty petty IMO. At best this gets noted for future. Welcome to my foe list.

IcePack

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:38 am
by Funkyterrance
IcePack wrote:
Edric Wolfswift wrote:
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.


According to the Community Guidelines this is not a minor infraction...


You need more than a single infraction. Once can easily be a mistake (as he admits and even apologized for). Pretty petty IMO. At best this gets noted for future. Welcome to my foe list.

IcePack


As someone pointed out the offender has done this more than once. Whenever someone besides his buddy joins his game he deadbeats. This is abuse or at least gross negligence.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:12 pm
by IcePack
Funkyterrance wrote:
IcePack wrote:
Edric Wolfswift wrote:
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.


According to the Community Guidelines this is not a minor infraction...


You need more than a single infraction. Once can easily be a mistake (as he admits and even apologized for). Pretty petty IMO. At best this gets noted for future. Welcome to my foe list.

IcePack


As someone pointed out the offender has done this more than once. Whenever someone besides his buddy joins his game he deadbeats. This is abuse or at least gross negligence.


As someone whos intelligent and good at poison rome, you should know that more than one instance needs to be reported in the C&A case :)
IcePack

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:44 pm
by Arama86n
IcePack wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
IcePack wrote:
Edric Wolfswift wrote:
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.


According to the Community Guidelines this is not a minor infraction...


You need more than a single infraction. Once can easily be a mistake (as he admits and even apologized for). Pretty petty IMO. At best this gets noted for future. Welcome to my foe list.

IcePack


As someone pointed out the offender has done this more than once. Whenever someone besides his buddy joins his game he deadbeats. This is abuse or at least gross negligence.


As someone whos intelligent and good at poison rome, you should know that more than one instance needs to be reported in the C&A case :)
IcePack


8-[
oh, common guys, if your going to comment, at least look at the facts first. It's not a lot of evidence to go through, the suspect has played 12 games, and 11 of them are with the same person, One with the accuser which he deadbeat. In other words, no he has never done this before.

On the other hand, his friend/partner blehotsky, now HE has deadbeat several games, apparently every game not joined by the accused. So if anything, the wrong guy is on trial.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:12 pm
by Funkyterrance
IcePack wrote:
As someone whos intelligent and good at poison rome, you should know that more than one instance needs to be reported in the C&A case :)
IcePack


Ouch, what a shot. ;)
You're right in that technically it's a minor infraction if one at all but you've got to admit it's lame. I suppose it's the fact that the guy admits to deliberately missing turns, not due to being busy or leaving the site but he just outright refuses to finish a game he started. He can at least finish this game and then the OP can foe him and move on. I was sort of under the impression that the reason you need more than one offense to file a report was to have evidence that the deadbeating was intentional but in this case only one instance is needed since the accused outright admits it!

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:03 am
by Edric Wolfswift
My point exactly... When you openly admit you clearly intend to break a rule, there needs to be no further evidence gathered.

Funkyterrance wrote:
IcePack wrote:
As someone whos intelligent and good at poison rome, you should know that more than one instance needs to be reported in the C&A case :)
IcePack


Ouch, what a shot. ;)
You're right in that technically it's a minor infraction if one at all but you've got to admit it's lame. I suppose it's the fact that the guy admits to deliberately missing turns, not due to being busy or leaving the site but he just outright refuses to finish a game he started. He can at least finish this game and then the OP can foe him and move on. I was sort of under the impression that the reason you need more than one offense to file a report was to have evidence that the deadbeating was intentional but in this case only one instance is needed since the accused outright admits it!

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:40 am
by sniffie
this report has been noted for future reference en Bruski82 is advised to play ALL his games, not only the ones against friends.

sniff

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:40 pm
by Funkyterrance
sniffie wrote:this report has been noted for future reference en Bruski82 is advised to play ALL his games, not only the ones against friends.

sniff


*thumbs up*

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:05 am
by Pilager
cooldeals wrote:Ignoring both sides of this. I didn't know that someone could be punished in C&A for something like this with just a single offense. Usually there is some kind of standard like 5 cases in the past 6 months for minor type infractions I thought.

Re: Bruski82[pending]SN

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:11 am
by Pilager
Edric Wolfswift wrote:People like scoobyzx10r who endorse his behavior are no better than the offender. If rules mean nothing to you then you will be just another name on the Foe list.