Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team, Global Moderators
comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game
2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot
Symmetry wrote:comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game
Aye, in a three player game where one player (green) is consistently on the back foot, it's not a good idea to say:2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot
Gillipig wrote:People should seriously start worshiping me!


General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes
general sharon
Symmetry wrote:General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes
general sharon
Well, I and the mod have asked for more examples. From experience, they won't move on something like this if it's a one off, and a pretty ambiguous one. If there's more evidence, that would add weight.
Up to you.
sniffie wrote:Do you have more examples then only this game. Otherwise I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
If you do not wish to play this person again, foe him. Feel free to rate accordingly.
sniff


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest