Evil Semp wrote:krusher wrote:The only game I am in with them is the fog of war. hopefully mods have some way to see through fog and verify what I said as true.
No we can't see through the fog. If we did we wouldn't be able to play fog games.krusher wrote:How much longer is this going to take? This is an open and shut case, evidence is there. Whack the hammer down mods
This is far from being an open and shut case. All the evidence you have provided is circumstantial.
Just because someone doesn't make a move that you think is obvious might not be so obvious to the accused. This game is also flat rate which means if Bmusic attempted to eliminate J-bone the most troops he would have gotten in a mid turn would have been 10 +2 for any of the cards he held. He would have had to eliminate 3-6 troops. You assume that these two were communicating between each other but I can't assume that. Maybe Bmusic didn't think it was worth the risk to eliminate J-bone. How many troops would Bmusic have lost going for the rainbow trade?
Would Bmusic have had a chance to win the game if he eliminated J-bone? Remember they both only had 3 countries when Bmusic started his turn. Eliminating J-bone would have been more beneficial to you than it would have been for himself.
In the other games on one hand you complain they don't attack each then when they do you attack each other you minimize it for only taking cards.krusher wrote:Game 12057393
Comment: Jbone and Bmusic are communicating with a 3rd player (where they are encouraging him to attack a 4th player in game chat.)
Trying to influence players in game chat is part of the game.krusher wrote:I did far less than they ever did and I was punished most severely. These guys are going beyond secret diplomacy they are account sitting each other in the same games, they are virtually multys.
[krusher wrote:Game 10556619
Comment: In this game jbone admits to account sitting for bmusic!!! he posts in chat that he is Sitting! Yes I repeat sitting for bmusic even though they are both playing in the same bloody game together! This is absurd!!! Nothing short of having a multy. "2012-02-17 05:34:19 - bmusic: J-bone for bmusic" and again they Never attacked each other throughout the entire bloody game!
These guys are not account sitting for each other at this time. They might have in the past but not right now.
The accused are no multi's and both accounts are not being controlled by one. The game where bmusic sat for J-bone is over a year old. I could have been an honest mistake. Why announce in chat if you are cheating?
For the sitting in the same game I will NOTE this. For the secret diplomacy the are CLEARED.
You guys are truly worthless, I made very good case with strong evidence, not in one but several games that these two have played together. There is nothing else that I or anyone else could of done short of having one of them confess. We both know secret alliances in this game is repent, you would think that with such solid evidence you would pursue the case instead of trying to defend them, perhaps your getting your position mixed up your the judge not their defense and if they have a problem with the verdict they could always appeal it, it would atleast keep them in their toes regarding rule breaking which they did, come on... sitting each other while both are active in the same game? your gonna tell me this is ok or that this is not a foundation for these two to develop further abuse/cheating? Maybe its a new more lenient policy that CC has to let everyone slide, what ever the case I got the information that I needed. I'll be turning a blind and an actively encouraging such abuse from now on, since your investigations are nothing but a kangaroo court.
bonis nocet quisqus malis perpercit-
Whoever spares the bad injures the good (Publius Syrus)