Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Funkyterrance wrote:This method of making new multis for new games as opposed to just using the same multis as last time does seem rather odd but it also could be that the person lost the passwords of the originals.
Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:the multi check is pending
there is something else more interesting.....
Kelisitaan wrote:Badz, keep hating. I'll leave with this quote that sums it up better than I ever could: You're either pro or you're noob, that's life.
IR1SH ACE wrote:Kelisitaan wrote:Badz, keep hating. I'll leave with this quote that sums it up better than I ever could: You're either pro or you're noob, that's life.![]()
![]()
man ur a noob farmin, possible multi makin sad sack.... u have nearly 3 full pages of the same 5 player Classic Map games, what a coincidence that new players (?) can only join up to 5 player games until they have completed 5 games and also the fact the all new players go straight to Classic map like flies to shit.....but im sure ur not aware of any of this.....lmao... and u just like 5 player Classics....lol
enjoy that paper hat mate....be seen u around on another account possibly
Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Gillipig wrote:Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Okay, so he's not a multie. But he has clearly targeted new recruits with the type of games he play. And that alone have been reason enough for punishment in other cases. Why are you letting him go so easily?
Gillipig wrote:Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Okay, so he's not a multie. But he has clearly targeted new recruits with the type of games he play. And that alone have been reason enough for punishment in other cases. Why are you letting him go so easily?
Edric Wolfswift wrote:Gillipig wrote:Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Okay, so he's not a multie. But he has clearly targeted new recruits with the type of games he play. And that alone have been reason enough for punishment in other cases. Why are you letting him go so easily?
And what will CC do when he fails to curtail "the type of game play"? Will the matter and the punishment be made public?
Edric Wolfswift wrote:I wouldn't lower myself to play with the likes of someone like you, and no one else should either. You obviously got away with cheating and everyone knows it. Anyone who disagrees and supports your type of behavior will make the Foe list just as fast as you did.
You are a delusional fool... If you were "doing nothing wrong" CC would not have told you to curtail the type of game play you were engaging in.
Edric Wolfswift wrote:I wouldn't lower myself to play with the likes of someone like you, and no one else should either. You obviously got away with cheating and everyone knows it. Anyone who disagrees and supports your type of behavior will make the Foe list just as fast as you did.
You are a delusional fool... If you were "doing nothing wrong" CC would not have told you to curtail the type of game play you were engaging in.
Kelisitaan wrote:Gillipig wrote:Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Okay, so he's not a multie. But he has clearly targeted new recruits with the type of games he play. And that alone have been reason enough for punishment in other cases. Why are you letting him go so easily?
So how exactly do I "target" new recruits?
Gillipig wrote:Kelisitaan wrote:Gillipig wrote:Karl_R_Kroenen wrote:The accused is CLEARED of the accusation of being a multi.
As far as the other interesting issue: the player has been communicated with, as it is a private matter between CC and that player, to curtail the type game play he/she is engaging in.
Okay, so he's not a multie. But he has clearly targeted new recruits with the type of games he play. And that alone have been reason enough for punishment in other cases. Why are you letting him go so easily?
So how exactly do I "target" new recruits?
The vast majority of your opponents are new recruits, you may have some bullshit reason for why you prefer these games but words normally means nothing in cases like this. If you exclusively play a lot of these games you get at least a warning, if you've only played something like 20 in a row you can get away with an encouragement to stop it. You've played hundreds of these games, you owe your rank to taking advantage of new recruits, you should not get away with a slap on the wrist, you should be officially warned! Or point reseted. I'm disappointed in the outcome of this report.
Edric Wolfswift wrote:CC seems to have ignored the fact that MANY of these games involve 3-4 newly created accounts, often created within just a few minutes of each other, most of whom make Kelisitaan's game the first if not only game they join, and then they deadbeat.
Just because CC either cannot prove it, or chooses to let you off lightly, does not mean you are not guilty of cheating.
IR1SH ACE wrote:no matter how u try and spin it....u are a new recruit farmer, I really dont know how they have let u away with this...im sure a reach around was involved but I am not surprised by yet another in a long line of baffling C&A verdicts, suppose it depends on the mood of the mods at the time....lol
all u have to do is keep ur settings & ur Classic map and just add 1 more player....why not 6 player games?
Im sure u have some BS excuse about how 6 players would upset ur strategy or some other shit.....once again very disappointed in a C&A verdict...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users