Page 1 of 1

Re: cooldeals and westbo

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:50 pm
by BGtheBrain
Locked: since cooldeals is a clan mate, I will not handle the case.

Re: cooldeals and westbo[pending]es

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:21 am
by Evil Semp
cooldeals and westbo are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

I think people are confused about secret diplomacy isn't. Secret diplomacy isn't when an opponent makes an attack that you think he shouldn't have made or doesn't make an attack that you think he should have. When someone makes a retaliatory attack many times someone else will get an advantage from that attack, that doesn't make it secret diplomacy.

I couldn't find anything in the log that would convince me of secret diplomacy. Your evidence is more what you think he should have done and that isn't enough to convince me of SD.

Re: cooldeals and westbo[pending]es

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:01 pm
by wreckead
Evil Semp wrote:cooldeals and westbo are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

I think people are confused about secret diplomacy isn't. Secret diplomacy isn't when an opponent makes an attack that you think he shouldn't have made or doesn't make an attack that you think he should have. When someone makes a retaliatory attack many times someone else will get an advantage from that attack, that doesn't make it secret diplomacy.

I couldn't find anything in the log that would convince me of secret diplomacy. Your evidence is more what you think he should have done and that isn't enough to convince me of SD.



Point taken semp. It was just a suspicion.

Re: cooldeals and westbo[pending]es

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:44 pm
by Evil Semp
wreckead wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:cooldeals and westbo are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

I think people are confused about secret diplomacy isn't. Secret diplomacy isn't when an opponent makes an attack that you think he shouldn't have made or doesn't make an attack that you think he should have. When someone makes a retaliatory attack many times someone else will get an advantage from that attack, that doesn't make it secret diplomacy.

I couldn't find anything in the log that would convince me of secret diplomacy. Your evidence is more what you think he should have done and that isn't enough to convince me of SD.



Point taken semp. It was just a suspicion.


I just want to thank you and cooldeals for the way you guys have responded to my posts and PM's.