Page 1 of 1

nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [Closed] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:28 am
by schiballs
Accused:

nomdeguerre


The accused are suspected of:

Intentionally Deadbeating

Other: Just look at the chat! It's very simple.


Game number(s):

Game 11018673

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 1:18 pm
by thechuck51
He hasn't actually deadbeated though. he hasn't even missed a turn.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:22 pm
by The_Samurai
thechuck51 wrote:He hasn't actually deadbeated though. he hasn't even missed a turn.

He will if he applies what he wrote in the chat. Let's wait and see if he does it.
He is also giving too much descriptive information in what is supposed to be a foggy game actually.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:42 pm
by thechuck51
The_Samurai wrote:
thechuck51 wrote:He hasn't actually deadbeated though. he hasn't even missed a turn.

He will if he applies what he wrote in the chat. Let's wait and see if he does it.
He is also giving too much descriptive information in what is supposed to be a foggy game actually.

Or he could just be lying to cyan. I just think it was premature to file an abuse report. Also, I don't believe there is any rule regarding revealing information in a fog game.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:40 pm
by deathcomesrippin
This is going to remain open until the end of the game.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:28 am
by Donelladan
Isnt it a bit vicious to fill a report against him rather than telling him directly in the chat that he is not allowed to deadbeat like that?

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:52 am
by jltile1
This game looks like severe account sharing case against the accuser took how many turns for months

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:45 pm
by ralt584489
there is no account sharing.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:00 pm
by jltile1
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:33 pm
by rishaed
jltile1 wrote:
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

There is nothing wrong with having someone sit for your account. :roll: I admit it seems a bit excessive, however since they are not in the same game, there is nothing here to be penalized for ;)
I would even say that as long as it was a team game, and they were on the same team it would be fine as long as it was put in the game chat.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:39 pm
by jltile1
rishaed wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

There is nothing wrong with having someone sit for your account. :roll: I admit it seems a bit excessive, however since they are not in the same game, there is nothing here to be penalized for ;)
I would even say that as long as it was a team game, and they were on the same team it would be fine as long as it was put in the game chat.



I thought KA made it clear about playing turns for people. And 19 turns in a row over months seems beyond excessive. :idea: account sitting is one thing but this is clearly account take over. :-$

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:17 pm
by schiballs
jltile1 wrote:
rishaed wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

There is nothing wrong with having someone sit for your account. :roll: I admit it seems a bit excessive, however since they are not in the same game, there is nothing here to be penalized for ;)
I would even say that as long as it was a team game, and they were on the same team it would be fine as long as it was put in the game chat.



I thought KA made it clear about playing turns for people. And 19 turns in a row over months seems beyond excessive. :idea: account sitting is one thing but this is clearly account take over. :-$


It certainly wasn't 19 turns in a row. Even if it was, I was on vacation in Laos. If I'm going to be penalized for having vacation away from my computer for weeks at a time, then that's fine. Not gonna spend my vacation time at home so I can play an online game....

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:03 pm
by thechuck51
schiballs wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
rishaed wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

There is nothing wrong with having someone sit for your account. :roll: I admit it seems a bit excessive, however since they are not in the same game, there is nothing here to be penalized for ;)
I would even say that as long as it was a team game, and they were on the same team it would be fine as long as it was put in the game chat.



I thought KA made it clear about playing turns for people. And 19 turns in a row over months seems beyond excessive. :idea: account sitting is one thing but this is clearly account take over. :-$

The_Samurai for schiballs: It certainly wasn't 19 turns in a row. Even if it was, I was on vacation in Laos. If I'm going to be penalized for having vacation away from my computer for weeks at a time, then that's fine. Not gonna spend my vacation time at home so I can play an online game....

fixed your post

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:16 pm
by jltile1
I think the point is this if you cannot take 99 percent of your turns you have no business playing any games. If you leave for a week great but to leave multiple weeks and have people play your turns you should not be in the game. And the fact of the matter is cyan missed one turn and gets reported but 95 people played the others turns give me a break. Don't the mods ever get one those. People come up with this bullshit all day long

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:01 am
by The_Samurai
jltile1 wrote:
rishaed wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
ralt584489 wrote:there is no account sharing.



Ok sorry account giving ? For months there was someone else taking turns then cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB the accuser should of not even been in the game as of what August hasn't made their own turn.

There is nothing wrong with having someone sit for your account. :roll: I admit it seems a bit excessive, however since they are not in the same game, there is nothing here to be penalized for ;)
I would even say that as long as it was a team game, and they were on the same team it would be fine as long as it was put in the game chat.



I thought KA made it clear about playing turns for people. And 19 turns in a row over months seems beyond excessive. :idea: account sitting is one thing but this is clearly account take over. :-$


I certainly never took 19 consecutive turns in this game. I am admittedly an account sitter for schiballs but have taken a max of 4 to 5 consecutive turns in this game if I recall properly, although it did occur a few times. The game was started in May 2012 - how can you expect a player not to take an extensive holiday in almost 11 months anyway? By the way, make a Map Rank on my profile, and you will see that I have very little experience in playing this map, and also in playing fog trench, so it was certainly not an advantage to schiballs to have me as a sitter on this map.

"cyan misses one turn and gets accused of DB" was stated above by a player. Am I missing something? I don't see anywhere that cyan is accused of DB. Yellow is the accused one.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:08 am
by ralt584489
sorry, misunderstood what was being said. I thought someone was suggesting that yellow and i are the same person. This whole thing is kind of silly.

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:19 am
by Symmetry
So, if I'm getting this right the OP is accusing a player of intentionally deadbeating in a game where that player has not deadbeated, or even missed a turn?

Re: nomdeguerre - Intentionally Deadbeating [PEnding] DCR

PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:08 am
by deathcomesrippin
It seems he has not.

Closed and locked.