BigBallinStalin wrote:anonymus wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wasn't defending anyone... but sometimes when a person attacks you and makes both of you weak in a game, you don't have a lot of options.. sometimes hitting the fool back who destroyed the balance of the game is your only real option..
well if you read the gamelog you see this is not the case..
i was in the strong position, and she was the weakest player.. i was trying to keep the third player from growing and would have succeeded if SHE hadnt kept attacking me.. so basically she is the fool who threw the balance..
and that if anything must be pointdumping especially if you now say she does this a lot..
also nice catch with the ratings left sym..
i guess my post in suggested foe-thread was more accurate than i knew..
She prevented you from winning, so now you file a cheating complaint? Seems very sportsmanlike. Let's throw in charges of international kitten fighting while we're at it!
If you're the weakest player, and the strongest player is dominating the second-strongest, would you (1) sit there and do nothing, or (2) prevent the strongest from winning? (Sure, she attacked you for longer than you'd like--maybe you're the reason why she's the weakest, who knows. What details are missing from your story?).
In any three player stalemate, if someone 'throws the balance', should they be accused of cheating? Or should they sit there and do nothing or very little--considering how easy accusing someone of 'cheating' seems to be?
ITT- BBS hasn't read the game log or the previous posts.