mccallan25 wrote:Those of us in the game foe'd them and quickly took them out. We definitely disagree on ratings abuse it appears. 29 one stars he gave for 43 people. 7 people 2 stars. Not to mention when you look at who he actually gave one stars to didn't say anything or do any thing in the game except beat him or be in a game that he was beaten.
mccallan25 wrote:I play with a group of men and women I have known for many years now. I did point out to the others in the game what was clearly going on and they obviously agreed since the offenders were promptly taken out. Surely you have the ability to read our private messages and see there was no collusion. If you can't I would be more than happy to forward it to you.
mccallan25 wrote:As far as rating abuse. It's pretty amazing that if your beaten in a game over and over and you then turn around and give anyone and everyone that beats you the lowest score possible that is not considered abuse.
mccallan25 wrote:I would like to hear what the odds are for 2 people in a 6 person game to play back to back turns three times in a row with in minutes of each other. Done the math yet? When you finally do you will see I am more likely to get struck by lightening.
Users browsing this forum: Eddard Stark