Page 1 of 1

simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:00 am
by Eddygp
Accused:

simmons4
smegal69


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):
Game 12857917

Comments:
This is a freestyle game I'm talking about, and they consistently play at the exact same time with like 30 seconds between their log-ins.
I would like someone too look through to see if they are multis, as I can't do so.

Re: simmons4 and smegal69

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:08 am
by aad0906
Experienced dubs freestyle players will coordinate their turns so they can fort each other during each turn for extra striking power. When I am in a freestyle teamgame I will time my turn to coincide with my teammate,s, through pm's, walling or instant messaging. Also to make sure the team ends the turn first so it will also be allowed to start the next, so they can break bonuses before the other team starts and collects.

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [pending] BG

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:31 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
I've played dubs freestyle against them both, and they are quite skilled. It looks like they are doing as aad0906 stated... Coordinating their attacks. Nothing illegal

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [pending] BG

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:31 pm
by simmons4
if my muti is taking 30 seconds to log in after i do he needs a faster internet or i need a new one, any volunteers

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [pending] BG

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:59 pm
by perchorin
This is truly strange. I've never seen smegal69 take a turn in anything less than 23 hours!

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [pending] BG

PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:38 am
by grifftron
perchorin wrote:This is truly strange. I've never seen smegal69 take a turn in anything less than 23 hours!


That's because his noob ass has to skype with 10 players before he takes his turns... in some cases, even visit them in a small country in Asia just so he can take his turn (sadly.. speaking from experience...).

edit: And I agree! make it a rule that every player has to take their turns within the first hour or they will be banned... brilliant idea perchorin!

-griff

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [pending] BG

PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:50 am
by Eddygp
Well, I was actually just surprised at the amazing speed they had when logging in... Synchronizing like that to play is really difficult in every turn of the game. I'm sorry if I was mistaken, it won't happen again.

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:44 pm
by BGtheBrain
After closely looking at this one, I am noting it for the future.

It does appear that each user was taking their own turns in the game(s)

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:48 am
by stahrgazer
NOTED? Not dismissed?

Then every freestyle team who coordinates their moves should be noted.

Granted, I have additional information not available to most: Skype. I see these players log on, sometimes talk to them when they're taking their turns on various games.

But when Bg adds,
BGtheBrain wrote: It does appear that each user was taking their own turns in the game(s)
(which I understand is checked via which servers were logged into at the time the games progress or something like that that CC has used to identify folks that log on from the same household) - BG says it appears they're each taking their turns, yet still NOTES it?

:roll:

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:15 am
by chapcrap
Yeah, no more making notes for future reference!! :roll:

Noting something doesn't mean anything, stahrgazer. It just means that they can keep track of it in case there actually is a pattern of abuse. I'm not mad about this getting noted: viewtopic.php?f=239&t=176059

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:28 pm
by therev1957
How can they be multies when one is in the US and the other is in Australia? BESIDES smegal69 is a crusty old man and simmons is barely wet behind the ears...duh doesn't take much to figure out that they are not multies!

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:08 pm
by jltile1
Agreed this is very stupid to be noted as its a freestyle game and that is how you win talking the move over then playing at the same time ????


I must need to be noted also!!!!

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:00 am
by stahrgazer
chapcrap wrote:Yeah, no more making notes for future reference!! :roll:

Noting something doesn't mean anything, stahrgazer. It just means that they can keep track of it in case there actually is a pattern of abuse. I'm not mad about this getting noted: https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 9&t=176059



I understand what "noted" means, chapcrap. My point is, how is it any part of a pattern "of abuse" for a freestyle team to log in at the same time, unless their isp's are the same, which should be check-able. If it was checked and the isp's are the same, then I can understand this being "noted."

Otherwise, unless CC is saying freestyle players can never play their turns at the same time, then "noting" this is ridiculous.

I can almost guarantee you that unless CC does make that rule that in TEAM Freestyle, that the TEAMS cannot make their moves at the same time, but must do so totally sequentally - then I guarantee you that you WILL see a pattern of these two taking their turns at approximately the same time. Sometimes, they may even log in within 3 (not 30) seconds of each other, depending on their isp/computer lagtimes.

Moreover, if this is noted - without "the same isp" (and I'm pretty sure you won't find their isp's being the same or even similar) then CC should hunt down and "note" any other freestyle team that coordinates their moves.

Re: simmons4 and smegal69 [noted] BG

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:06 am
by greenoaks
BGtheBrain wrote:After closely looking at this one, I am noting it for the future.

It does appear that each user was taking their own turns in the game(s)

please explain why this has been noted and not dismissed.