Androidz wrote:Don't mean to be the badass here but, do you know how small the map is gonna be?
Lets say 8 players..8 tech trees?
One small map?
It'll be fine i think.
Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
Androidz wrote:Don't mean to be the badass here but, do you know how small the map is gonna be?
Lets say 8 players..8 tech trees?
One small map?

t-o-m wrote:Androidz wrote:Don't mean to be the badass here but, do you know how small the map is gonna be?
Lets say 8 players..8 tech trees?
One small map?
It'll be fine i think.

yeti_c wrote:Another thought I had - Spies could perhaps bombard the tech trees too!?
Problem with that - is that you could grab the opposing spy - and bombard your tech tree - which can reduce the amount of research you can do.
C>
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Red Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| r1 | | n100 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Blue Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| b1 | | n100 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Red Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| r11 | | n100 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Blue Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| b1 | | n100 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+ +----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Red Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| r3 | | n87 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
| Blue Lab | | Tech 1 | | Tech 2 |
| b1 | | n100 | | n500 |
+----------+ +---------+ +---------+
t-o-m wrote:It sounds great!
What sort of land layout are you thinking?
I used to love Civ - mainly because of the strategy, but i havnt seen it in a while.
This would truely be an interesting map.
RjBeals wrote:I must say OliverFA - you deserve a great welcome to the foundry. fresh Ideas and good attitude - exactly what we need around here. I'm partial to classic style gameplay, but have been wanting to broaden my range. I'll try to think through what you've posted so I can grasp the idea better. I hope you stick around here
Androidz wrote:t-o-m wrote:Androidz wrote:Don't mean to be the badass here but, do you know how small the map is gonna be?
Lets say 8 players..8 tech trees?
One small map?
It'll be fine i think.
Maybe, maybe not only time will show:)
OliverFA wrote:Androidz wrote:t-o-m wrote:Androidz wrote:Don't mean to be the badass here but, do you know how small the map is gonna be?
Lets say 8 players..8 tech trees?
One small map?
It'll be fine i think.
Maybe, maybe not only time will show:)
Excuse my ignorance. But: Which is the size for the board image?
I think it could work because you don't need to make the tech trees are very big. In fact that is why I proposed the "can research any basic tech" focus instead of a true tech tree to avoid having to draw all the arrows.
If it was needed, we could cut it to 6 players to make room, but I think we can make with 8.
OliverFA wrote:Excuse my ignorance. But: Which is the size for the board image?

t-o-m wrote:OliverFA wrote:Excuse my ignorance. But: Which is the size for the board image?
Small:
600 height | 630 width
Large:
800 height | 840 width (i think)

eigenvector wrote:yeti_c wrote:Another thought I had - Spies could perhaps bombard the tech trees too!?
Problem with that - is that you could grab the opposing spy - and bombard your tech tree - which can reduce the amount of research you can do.
C>
Wouldn't these be saboteurs rather than spies?

OliverFA wrote:Excuse my ignorance. But: Which is the size for the board image?
I think it could work because you don't need to make the tech trees are very big. In fact that is why I proposed the "can research any basic tech" focus instead of a true tech tree to avoid having to draw all the arrows.
If it was needed, we could cut it to 6 players to make room, but I think we can make with 8.

Users browsing this forum: OliverFA and 0 guests