I think I've already apologized for what happened, if this is not enough for you, then I don't know what I can do!
You have it all wrong; Mistakes happen, I get that, I was just simply telling you where I'm coming from, that's all. I forgive you
but at least now you understand a bit of my anguish...
And just for the record, when I moved back the map into the process, I immediately sent a PM to Marshalney asking him to give me more details about the map and its gameplay. When I received a reply I immediately
moved this back to the graphic workshop, so if double check something (to prevent a possible failure) is for you something wrong, then you didn't understand what's my job here and, more in general, what's the CAs job. All the things we do are just to assure the all the mapmakers produce the best possible maps that they can produce and that those maps always reach the CC standard in terms of gameplay and graphics. Don't take our actions in the wrong way.
I get that, I do, but you should have consulted him before
moving it, since he was the one that approved the gameplay (along with Evil DIMwit). By making that call you doubted your own volunteer staff's judgement...
Ah, sorry, I know it's not my place to criticize. You and MrBenn are quite busy, I'm sure.
thenobodies80 wrote:You should only be patient, because patience is part of the Foundry process.
Yes... I realize...
Said that, the only graphical concern I have is on the small version, if it was my map I would enlarge a bit the small version, to increase the size of the text in the legend (if there's no way to fit all the text with the space you have now).
I also noticed that some colors don't give so good result through vischeck, but it shouldn't affect the playability of the map then I don't bother you about this.
You mean, add a few pixels to the small version to fit a larger font size?
And nobodies, regardless of what I say, I think you're doing a fine job here. I apologize if I've offended you in any way.