ian.
Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

iancanton wrote:i actually thought the current impassables were place-holders for proper mountains or something. although they don't look pretty at all, they do work for gameplay purposes in the sense that they're clear.
ian.
DiM wrote:iancanton wrote:i actually thought the current impassables were place-holders for proper mountains or something. although they don't look pretty at all, they do work for gameplay purposes in the sense that they're clear.
ian.
they're not mountains or forests or rivers. that would not fit with the style of the map. they're just some abstract image that's meant to symbolize an impassable border. and as you said they're clear.
nolefan5311 wrote:The XML looks good. I will let tnb80 know.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!




thenobodies80 wrote:Finally, even if I agree, please remove the text in the bottom right corner on the large.![]()

natty dread wrote:thenobodies80 wrote:Finally, even if I agree, please remove the text in the bottom right corner on the large.![]()
lol, it'd have been so funny if that had gone unnoticed...
DiM wrote:natty dread wrote:thenobodies80 wrote:Finally, even if I agree, please remove the text in the bottom right corner on the large.![]()
lol, it'd have been so funny if that had gone unnoticed...
i'm surprised it lasted that long

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!


isaiah40 wrote:DiM this current version is a little, um, how should I say it, bright! Can you darken it a tad bit please?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest