[Abandoned] - Los Angeles

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby Incandenza on Mon May 12, 2008 2:01 am

ZOMG OAKTOWN YOU DA MAN! FINALLY !!!11111ELEVENTY

So, yeah, I'm excited about seeing a map of SoCal.

But I have a couple of trenchant comments:
1. I think you could get rid of Orange and the San Gabriel Valley, compact the map, and have more detailed neighborhoods (like Los Feliz, Koreatown, Lincoln Heights, Mar Vista, Naples, etc.) Basically make it a "true" Los Angeles map, as opposed to a Los Angeles Greater Metropolitan Area map.
2. Also, freeways were mentioned above, but I'd like to go into more detail about the concept: how about having the 101, 5, 405, 10, maybe the 605, 710, 105, etc, interspersed with onramps and the obvious interchanges. Then you could have one-way attacks on the freeways (in both directions: i.e. 101 North Silverlake would be able to attack 101 North Hollywood as well as 101 Hollywood Offramp, and 101 South Burbank would be able to attack 101 South Hollywood and 101 Hollywood Offramp, but 101 North Hollywood would NOT be able to attack 101 South Hollywood). It would be like a weird synthesis of a traditional geographic map like you have here and Circus Maximus (and it would be unlike anything else on the site). The advantage of the freeways is that you'd be able to (theoretically) only have to kill, say, three terits to get from Santa Monica to Downtown. The disadvantage, of course, is that someone puts a big honkin' army somewhere on the 10 East and creates the dreaded gridlock...
3. I don't think you need landmarks or any such, unless you were going to compact it further and go some sort of kitschy Maps of the Stars Homes sort of map. L.A. is a big tourist destination, but it seems to lack many of the traditional sorts of tourist spots like New York or Paris have. People go to Disneyland, the beach, and Hollywood, all of which could theoretically just be terits.

There's obviously geographical issues, but it seems more profitable at the moment to talk about large overarching concepts rather than nitty-gritty shit like that.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (8)
General Contribution (4)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby whitestazn88 on Mon May 12, 2008 1:03 pm

i'd like a landmark or two

well, just the big hollywood sign really

and i think that if you wanna do highways they have to have like 100000000 neutrals on them to show the traffic through LA lol

plus i'd like to thank you for adding pasadena. holla
Sergeant 1st Class whitestazn88
 
Posts: 3127
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: behind you
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2)
Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (1)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby bryguy on Mon May 12, 2008 1:04 pm

you could pull a DiM and have insane gameplay :mrgreen: no offense DiM
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4648
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby mibi on Mon May 12, 2008 1:31 pm

I'd like to see some freeways, its not LA with out a commute.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Medals: 13
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Map Contribution (5)
General Contribution (3)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby yeti_c on Mon May 12, 2008 1:39 pm

Gotta say - I like the sound of Inca's Freeways...

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (13) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (10)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby TaCktiX on Mon May 12, 2008 1:51 pm

I fourth Incandenza's freeway initiative. It'd be an interesting, and city-appropriate twist to LA. Take NYC for example: when people think about getting around New York, they think subway. When people think about getting around LA...they think of massive gridlock on the interstates.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2409
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD
Medals: 36
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (4)
General Contribution (6)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby InkL0sed on Mon May 12, 2008 5:02 pm

TaCktiX wrote:I fourth Incandenza's freeway initiative. It'd be an interesting, and city-appropriate twist to LA. Take NYC for example: when people think about getting around New York, they think subway. When people think about getting around LA...they think of massive gridlock on the interstates.


Tack beat me to it. The subways were a stroke of genius on the NYC map, something you only fully realize once you play it. Something similar on this map would be great.

I also agree with Incandenza -- I think you should stick to the city itself. But take that opinion with a grain of salt -- I've never been to LA and have no idea what the actual city is.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater
Medals: 23
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby Mjinga on Mon May 12, 2008 9:07 pm

I have and I'd agree with him too, especially if you put in freeways.
Reputation cleared. :) Never let it be said that Team CC don't investigate fairly.
Although they take bloody forever to do it...
Lieutenant Mjinga
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:36 pm
Medals: 18
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (3) Map Contribution (1)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby oaktown on Mon May 12, 2008 9:32 pm

Incandenza wrote:1. I think you could get rid of Orange and the San Gabriel Valley, compact the map, and have more detailed neighborhoods (like Los Feliz, Koreatown, Lincoln Heights, Mar Vista, Naples, etc.) Basically make it a "true" Los Angeles map, as opposed to a Los Angeles Greater Metropolitan Area map.

My concern about eliminating the valleys is that we'd be left with a big flat square with no impassables. Anyway, if we're going to include freeways - which I'm on board with - it makes more sense to me to keep the map stretched out and run them long distances... 101 and the 5 from the valley, the 10 running east west through everything. etc.

Incandenza wrote:2. Also, freeways were mentioned above, but I'd like to go into more detail about the concept: how about having the 101, 5, 405, 10, maybe the 605, 710, 105, etc, interspersed with onramps and the obvious interchanges. Then you could have one-way attacks on the freeways (in both directions: i.e. 101 North Silverlake would be able to attack 101 North Hollywood as well as 101 Hollywood Offramp, and 101 South Burbank would be able to attack 101 South Hollywood and 101 Hollywood Offramp, but 101 North Hollywood would NOT be able to attack 101 South Hollywood). It would be like a weird synthesis of a traditional geographic map like you have here and Circus Maximus (and it would be unlike anything else on the site). The advantage of the freeways is that you'd be able to (theoretically) only have to kill, say, three terits to get from Santa Monica to Downtown. The disadvantage, of course, is that someone puts a big honkin' army somewhere on the 10 East and creates the dreaded gridlock...

Gridlock on the 10? Never. (I fondly remember the day that I spent 20 minutes driving from downtown to UCLA, and two hours getting back.)

But yes, freeways could be fun. One way to go about this would be to make them separate territories, like NY; I'm not sure that this makes as much sense as it did with the New York subway, since that's a distinct underground system with its own stations, but it would give due power to the LA freeway system.

Another way to go would be to just run freeways through territories and give those territories special powers. You could give a bonus to holding all territories that link a freeway top to bottom. You could also allow freeway territories to do ranged attacks - say, you can attack neighboring territories as well as any territory that is two terits away via a freeway. Downtown LA and Burbank would then be able to attack each other by passing through Glendale on the freeway, even if you don't actually own Glendale. Thus nobody actually "owns" a stretch of freeway until you own the entire thing.

Incandenza wrote:3. I don't think you need landmarks or any such, unless you were going to compact it further and go some sort of kitschy Maps of the Stars Homes sort of map. L.A. is a big tourist destination, but it seems to lack many of the traditional sorts of tourist spots like New York or Paris have. People go to Disneyland, the beach, and Hollywood, all of which could theoretically just be terits.

Agreed. When it comes time to think about the graphics I intend to add fun stuff like the Hollywood sign, Watts Towers, and Space Mountain, but that'll just be gravy. :)
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4552
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (12)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby waiwai933 on Tue May 13, 2008 9:16 am

I live in La Canada, if you could maybe add that in. Otherwise, I agree with the "fun places" idea.
Corporal waiwai933
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: California, USA
Medals: 1
Standard Achievement (1)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby Incandenza on Tue May 13, 2008 7:33 pm

oaktown wrote:
Incandenza wrote:1. I think you could get rid of Orange and the San Gabriel Valley, compact the map, and have more detailed neighborhoods (like Los Feliz, Koreatown, Lincoln Heights, Mar Vista, Naples, etc.) Basically make it a "true" Los Angeles map, as opposed to a Los Angeles Greater Metropolitan Area map.

My concern about eliminating the valleys is that we'd be left with a big flat square with no impassables. Anyway, if we're going to include freeways - which I'm on board with - it makes more sense to me to keep the map stretched out and run them long distances... 101 and the 5 from the valley, the 10 running east west through everything. etc.


I'm thinking that, if graphically you could figure out a way to do over/underpasses, the freeways themselves could function as impassables... besides, you'd definitely want to keep the san fernando valley, plus there's always the LA river that could be used as an impassable.

I'm not opposed to having the san gabriel valley and OC (hell, I grew up in OC, and don't think I'm going to let you get away with calling that whole coastal bit "costa mesa" ;) ), but the freeways could conceptually take up quite a bit of space...

oaktown wrote:Gridlock on the 10? Never. (I fondly remember the day that I spent 20 minutes driving from downtown to UCLA, and two hours getting back.)

But yes, freeways could be fun. One way to go about this would be to make them separate territories, like NY; I'm not sure that this makes as much sense as it did with the New York subway, since that's a distinct underground system with its own stations, but it would give due power to the LA freeway system.


The way I envisioned it was that each chunk of freeway would be a terit, so you'd have direction freeway terits and ramp terits and interchange terits (which might start off neutral), freeways would be impassable save at under/overpasses.

oaktown wrote:Another way to go would be to just run freeways through territories and give those territories special powers. You could give a bonus to holding all territories that link a freeway top to bottom. You could also allow freeway territories to do ranged attacks - say, you can attack neighboring territories as well as any territory that is two terits away via a freeway. Downtown LA and Burbank would then be able to attack each other by passing through Glendale on the freeway, even if you don't actually own Glendale. Thus nobody actually "owns" a stretch of freeway until you own the entire thing.


That could work too.

oaktown wrote:Agreed. When it comes time to think about the graphics I intend to add fun stuff like the Hollywood sign, Watts Towers, and Space Mountain, but that'll just be gravy. :)


Nice. Hollywood sign definitely, and I love that you'll add the Watts Towers, an oft-neglected bit of LA history.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (8)
General Contribution (4)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby Bones2484 on Wed May 14, 2008 5:55 pm

The freeway idea that I read is brilliant. New York has it's subways... we have our freeways. You can probably include just the major freeways from the area. I'd suggest 5, 405, 10 (instead of the 91 and 210 since they all run the same direction through the same territories on the map above), 110, 57. If you add these in similarly to how the subways work in the New York map, you'd be able to take out the giant red arrows and have the freeways logically run through there instead.

Here's a map of our freeways if anyone needs it for reference: http://www.sigalert.com/map.asp?Region= ... os+Angeles

As far as your city choices, I like them. Ignore all the requests for city changes from people who want theirs up there (although I, too, don't like the "Great Highway" title). Anaheim and Westminster might be a little too big, Orange should probably come over at least half of that. Orange is a much larger city that shares a large border with Fullerton, remember that it goes all the way East past Villa Park towards Riverside, although you may have been thinking about Anaheim HILLS being that far east (two different cities). I would also recommend changing Yorba Linda to Brea and/or Diamond Bar and moving it North of Fullerton, as this is the only city choice I don't like, and having the connection to Riverside go through there instead of Fullerton (as that is where the 57 goes through).

I'm not too sure about South Orange County though. It just looks... weird. Tustin isn't in the right place (it is south of Santa Ana) and Irvine is much too large. Maybe you can put in Mission Viejo underneath Irvine in order to make that a 4 territory instead (which will help qualm some of the border issues you have).

I'd also probably refrain from putting in the tourist destination "bonuses" although it would be awesome to see some of the scenery built into the map (like the Hollywood sign, downtown). Disneyland/Angel Stadium/Dodger Stadium would be cool, but you may have to worry about copywrites.
User avatar
Major Bones2484
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA (G1)
Medals: 65
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (23) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (9) General Contribution (1)

Re: Los Angeles (read post 1 for feedback request)

Postby oaktown on Thu May 15, 2008 12:28 am

Click image to enlarge.
image


And the Foundry said Let there be freeways, and there were freeways. I particularly pleased with my freeway shields.

Now, what the hell do we do with them?? I don't want to make them territories in the way that the subway stations are territories in the NYC map (it's bee done), but I would like some discussion as to how we can work them into gameplay, for example:
1) ranged attacks - every territory on a freeway can attack any connected freeway terit two terits away. Clever but confusing.
2) put occasional on-/off-ramps and say you can attack any ramp territory from any other ramp territory. Simple, but not realistic.
3) bonuses for holding the entire length of a freeway... would be hard to capture and hold, and would require color coding each freeway (easy to do at this point... note to self: multiple freeway layers, with the bottom layer being the outer glow only).
4) bonuses for holding contiguous sections of a freeway... e.g. +1 for three connected sections of the 10, +2 for four connected territories, etc. Would require color-coding each freeway, as well as making it more clear which territory each freeway passes through, as right now there are some muddy places (East LA for example). This is MY kind of idea - I love 'make-your-own-bonus' gameplay features on maps (see Berlin). :idea: =D>

Bones: thanks for the detailed input... the freeways you suggested were just what I was planning: 5, 405, 101, 10, 110, 57. I don't know if I've ever even been on the 57, but it connects that side of the map nicely. After reading your other suggestions I went and found myself a map of Orange County and completely redrew the borders. I removed Yorba Linda entirely as it didn't do much for gameplay, and replaced it by adding Newport Beach in South O.C. Irvine will become smaller as I add hill graphics around the entire map, and and Newport Beach needs to extend further into Irvine... I'm on it. Mission Viejo is off the map in my opinion, but i think that a three territory, three border +2 region would be appropriate down there, especially with all of the freeway options in that part of the map.

No army circles on this map - I might stick with the shields motif, or do something even more LA...

Image
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4552
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (12)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Los Angeles - update pg 2 with freeways!

Postby Bones2484 on Thu May 15, 2008 1:07 am

Those freeways looks awesome!!!! Great work. The only thing I'd suggest is having the 405 and 5 (but still have the 5 go through Tustin) cross in Irvine - since it does anyways! While I love (to hate) the 101, I'm not too sure how important it will be in the map upon viewing it drawn in. Might make it look less cluttered without it. I don't know how to work the freeways though, but I will be sure to check the thread a lot to offer suggestions/comments.

The one thing that worries me is how possible it will be to add so many additional territories on freeways on the map w/o making it ridiculous. Not to mention putting in army circles (especially in downtown). I thought your original idea a few posts back of allowing territories to attack multiple territories away on the same freeway (or going through an interchange) was awesome. You can even give freeways their own "movement speed". ie: Territories on the 10 can attack 2 away while territories on the 5 can attack 3 (like Calvary in Waterloo).

Speaking of which, great idea using stars for the army circles :)

Another suggestion I may make - as someone questioned Orange County maybe needing another entrance - would be to add Catalina Island as a non-bonus territory and have it two-way connect to Newport Beach, Long Beach, and San Pedro (which would be created at the end of the 110 by splitting Palos Verdes in half). Just a thought.


Keep up the good work!


edit: On second thought, I think the 101 needs to stay.
Last edited by Bones2484 on Thu May 15, 2008 1:38 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Major Bones2484
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA (G1)
Medals: 65
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (23) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (9) General Contribution (1)

Re: Los Angeles - update pg 2 with freeways!

Postby edbeard on Thu May 15, 2008 1:17 am

I agree that It'd be kinda cool to have the Y (where 405 and 5 meet). That adds another freeway connection for your connect parts of the freeway idea.

stars is also a great idea.

coming along nicely.
User avatar
Major edbeard
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am
Medals: 18
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (1) Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

PreviousNext

Return to Recycling Box

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login