Moderator: Cartographers
bbqpenguin wrote:MrBenn wrote:If you take out the bridges, Colon (is that seriously the region name?) will be a divided region...
it's connected throught san miguel. if you think it would still be hard to hold, you could just bump up the bonus a point to reflect the difficulty
el-presidente wrote:Idea- If you control all four territories aroud the panama canal you should be ableto attack from a port on one side of the isthmus to a port on the other, as opposed to just being able to attack ports on the same side.
bbqpenguin wrote:MrBenn wrote:If you take out the bridges, Colon (is that seriously the region name?) will be a divided region...
it's connected throught san miguel. if you think it would still be hard to hold, you could just bump up the bonus a point to reflect the difficulty
InkL0sed wrote:Actually, thinking about it more, I think there should be a canal territory that borders all the ports.
el-presidente wrote:That would be good. It could stary nutural and get like a +1 bonus since it would be very hard to hold and would be the key to controling the map.
wcaclimbing wrote:I could put two water territories, one on each end of the canal.
They can attack all the ports on their side, as well as attack the other end of the canal. They could revert back to being neutral, so its sort of like "paying a fee" to cross through the canal, just like real life.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users