Forum

by **natty dread** on Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:01 pm

melech14 wrote:I like the gameplay but have never seen anyone take the objective. I think 17 neutral on bases is fine, but it would be nice to seee another change on the objective: how about 3 shuttles and 3 mine (or 4 mines).... that wat you will need to take the base at least once to gain a shuttle... and the objective will be an actual threat earlier in the game. Great map!

Except for 2 player games where both start with 4 shuttles.

by **Leehar** on Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:32 pm

natty_dread wrote:
melech14 wrote:I like the gameplay but have never seen anyone take the objective. I think 17 neutral on bases is fine, but it would be nice to seee another change on the objective: how about 3 shuttles and 3 mine (or 4 mines).... that wat you will need to take the base at least once to gain a shuttle... and the objective will be an actual threat earlier in the game. Great map!

Except for 2 player games where both start with 4 shuttles.

Thats actually an idea, why not in a 2 player have less shuttles, maybe 2 like in Feudal (tho it's objective is different.), or make the bases only capable of hitting separate shuttles (tho that would require maybe 1 more or less bases.) - this would maybe make it more like Das schloss where you actually may need to hit more than one of the bases to eliminate the opponent. These would just give another element of guesswork and make it less important to go directly for the bases, and start lowering your opponents drop.

by **natty dread** on Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:45 pm

Not possible.

by **MrBenn** on Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:51 pm

Has this discussion about neutral values come to a conclusion, or is there still some negotiation/discussion ongoing?

by **Victor Sullivan** on Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:14 pm

I retract my previous statement about upping the neutral count on the bases. I've been playing a bunch of Lunar War games (a lot of them I'm winning - OMG!) and I think the objective is much more doable and the base use has decreased (in a good way). I think we're ready for quench if you ask me, MrBenn.

by **natty dread** on Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:30 pm

If no one has any complaints about the gameplay, I'm ok with releasing this from beta.

by **jrh_cardinal** on Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:07 pm

natty_dread wrote:If no one has any complaints about the gameplay, I'm ok with releasing this from beta.

yes please

, preferably before saturday (probably not gonna happen)

by **natty dread** on Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:11 am

Why before saturday?

by **jrh_cardinal** on Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:44 pm

because that's when the last round of the clan league starts, and we can't use beta maps.

by **natty dread** on Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:26 pm

Well, we still have a few days then. If nothing comes up by friday I'll use my mind control ray on the foundry mods to get this quenched.

by **Victor Sullivan** on Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:05 pm

natty_dread wrote:Well, we still have a few days then. If nothing comes up by friday I'll use my mind control ray on the foundry mods to get this quenched.

Damn, I wish I could do that!!! Does it work on admins?

by **ender516** on Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:36 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Well, we still have a few days then. If nothing comes up by friday I'll use my mind control ray on the foundry mods to get this quenched.

Damn, I wish I could do that!!! Does it work on admins?

Hard to say... can you focus the ray that small? :-k

Just kidding, I have nothing but respect for the admins. I just couldn't resist a setup line like that!

by **natty dread** on Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:19 am

Victor Sullivan wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Well, we still have a few days then. If nothing comes up by friday I'll use my mind control ray on the foundry mods to get this quenched.

Damn, I wish I could do that!!! Does it work on admins?

It does, but you need at least 40 internets to be able to operate it.