South Africa 1885

[Industrial Helix]

Alright guys... this hits just about everything we talked about. Lowered the bonuses, got rid of Die Groot Trek and the Cape Colony Bonus. I tried on the one way attacks and mountain passages that Jefjef mentioned... they just seemed out of place. It's like, if there's mountains there what's the point in putting a pass? Anyway, here she is:

Click image to enlarge.

[jefjef]

Pretoria and region is a big ole bottleneck. Putting that route in gives you a little more flow & gets rid of a couple pocket dead ends.

[natty dread]

Well, IMO it's good to have some bottlenecks, if there's not too many of them. They're nice places to fort all your troops.

[Industrial Helix]

Yeah, I designed Pretoria to be that way given its significance as a major population and resources area. While it is definitely a bottleneck, it doesn't necessarily grant the person who holds it a bonus. With two more territories to defend, yes it gets the bonus, but still, the number of territories is large, meaning it will take time to gain it. I think it should be alright.

I got a couple of questions for you guys:

the border between Griguqatown and Kheis, is that clear enough? I think I might have to break the word GriquaTown into two and fit it differently.

Also, what do you make of the mountains?

[natty dread]

the border between Griguqatown and Kheis, is that clear enough? I think I might have to break the word GriquaTown into two and fit it differently.

I think it's fine.

Also, what do you make of the mountains?

Good otherwise, but they look a bit smudgy and unfocused. Maybe you could sharpen them a bit. Also you could add some shadowing on them.

[Industrial Helix]

Ok, got rid of the dotted lines in favor of anchors. All the ports connected anyway. I redrew all the borders because they were kind of lumpy. I also made some minor changes to make sure that the small version was going to have room for its army numbers. I added a drop shadow to the mountains and cleaned up some of the fuzzy bits and gave it a sharpen filter. I also cleaned up a few sloppy graphics tidbits.

Click image to enlarge.

[natty dread]

Yeah, that looks better, although now there are some parts that could use some subtle anti-aliasing.

Can't just please some people, eh

Also, the anchors are nice. Maybe reduce the glow around them a tiny bit. Not much, just a little nudge.

[soundman]

I just doesn't look like the anchors fit the rest of the map. Is there another look of anchor you could use?

[Industrial Helix]

Hmm... natty, what do you mean by anti-aliasing? I know its a photoshop deal but I really have no idea what it is. Thanks for any help or anyone else who might answer this.

Soundman... I hear ya. I might go for a thicker anchor or maybe something a little more wooden style.

[Incandenza]

I rather like the mountains, they fit in well with the whole hand-drawn aesthetic you've got going...

But I concur with soundman, the port icons don't fit, they're too clean. More to the point, I think there might be too many of them. In a few places there are ports separated by only a single terit, kinda rendering moot the strategic advantage thereof. I think you could safely get rid of Grahamstown and one of the 3 in the east.

[natty dread]

Hmm... natty, what do you mean by anti-aliasing?

Anti-aliasing is a type of blurring, it smooths out the pixelation of bitmap images. Don't know what software you use, so it might be called something else.

As for the anchors, make them a bit thicker. I think what bothers people is that while you have all the other lines drawn with a thicker brush, the anchors seem too "slim" so they don't seem to fit... Make them thicker and they should be ok.

[AndyDufresne]

I rather like the mountains, they fit in well with the whole hand-drawn aesthetic you've got going...

But I concur with soundman, the port icons don't fit, they're too clean.

Right, I agree with this. I like the theme you have on the map, and I'd adapt the port icons to a style reminiscent of the mountains hand-drawn aspect.

I also still don't like the blue water in the legend, but you already know that.

Have you experimented with colorblind tests to see if your colors are distinguishable? This may be important, especially because of the general lack of signifying color on the map (I.E. continents aren't solid).


--Andy

[jefjef]

Yeah, I designed Pretoria to be that way given its significance as a major population and resources area. While it is definitely a bottleneck, it doesn't necessarily grant the person who holds it a bonus. With two more territories to defend, yes it gets the bonus, but still, the number of territories is large, meaning it will take time to gain it. I think it should be alright.

Well one more comment in re of Pretoria. That bottleneck is over 10% of your tert total.

[Raskholnikov]

That\s 5 territories - which together do not constitute a region. One needs to conquer 2 more regions and defend 3 territories for that region. I don't find it that unusual.

[Industrial Helix]

I adjusted the anchors... I don't know if they work or not. They're a little thicker.

As for Pretoria, I really don't want to change it as it was a major hub for South Africa. All rail lnes would be going there, all roads would be going there, all economic resources would be going through there. It makes sense as major city to hold such weight on the map.

Click image to enlarge.