grandin wrote:Great start, natty!
A couple of suggestions:
In my opinion, the map is way to dark. As porkenbeans said, the water needs to be contrasted from the land. I also think that the land areas should have a more 'natural' feel to the colors.
The color scheme combined with the style of the legend makes the whole thing feel like an old worn-down soviet military base.
Splitting Sweden into only two regions might work, but not where it is done at the moment. Ask a swede where the northern parts of sweden begin, and he might say anything from Gävle to Mora or Sundsvall, but not many would agree that it is as far north as you've drawn the line - and no one would agree that Sveg is in the south of Sweden.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Estonia isn't considered part of Europe. Denmark is barely but is also part of Scandanavia & Nordic countries. Iceland is Nordic.
AndyDufresne wrote:This map has a long way to go visually.
Mechanically, the game play we'll have to delve into...
I think you have to develope the map with a regional perspective, rather than basing the gameplay on cities, but it's just a personal thought.
The iceland inset could be placed a bit more on the left because i don't think you can use that unused space in the left corner.
Aland, it's not clear if it is a part of south finland or south sweden.
Not sure about the link between Tallin and Helsinki (both with a +1 autodeploy)
Bonuses (values with autodeploy):
* Denmark +1 (+2)
* Estonia +2 (+3)
* Iceland +1 (+2)
* N.Norway +3
* S.Norway +3 (+4)
* N.Sweden +4
* S.Sweden +4 (+5)
* N.Finland +4
* S.Finland +4 (+5)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest