natty_dread wrote:Orange on blue is not a good combination. They are opposite colours, which creates a really bright contrast, which also does not translate well into JPG (looks very fuzzy).
Industrial Helix wrote:I wonder if bringing back the clearer ice might be better because I'm having trouble identifying islands as two islands seem to me to be connected under the ice.
Industrial Helix wrote:And personally, I still have a hard time reading this map. I think its connecting the numbers with the territories and the names. Perhaps reduce the opacity on the army circles or get rid of them all together.
Industrial Helix wrote:Perhaps stretching the map a bit at the expense of the lower left corner would alleviate some congestion in the center. It's already pretty cramped in the middle as it is... do you know for sure that the small map is going to work?
army of nobunaga wrote:im a hard sell... trust me... people call me "jerk" and "asshole" a lot here.
shakeycat wrote:Do I really have to say what is and isn't an island? How do I say this, "Islands are peach-coloured pieces of land, and do not include Ellesmere or Baffin and especially not Quebec" ?
shakeycat wrote:Hopefully Clyde River/Pangnirtung are clearer now with their non-connection.
Do you mean Illusiat and Davis Strait? Because I would think the Disko Bay connection is obvious.
Shifted the ice between Somerset and Lancaster: is it better? Still difficult?
Evil DIMwit wrote:Isn't McClure 4 regions, counting Banks Island?
shakeycat wrote:I suppose bisecting the map with a line of neutrals isn't a problem, since Route 66 does it.
shakeycat wrote:Build-a-bonus would be +1 for how many?, and need they be touching or no?
It would appear that development of this map has stalled. If the mapmaker wants to continue with the map, then one of the Foundry Moderators will be able to help put the thread back into the Foundry system, after an update has been made.
Users browsing this forum: Bawm79