The Texan Wars [Quenched]

[bryguy]

I see a lot of people having this

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

at the top of their XML. This is not necessary to my knowledge and is added when you view the XML with an XML editor. When you write the XML, <map> should always be at the start

Actually, we must have that line in every map xml file. In this case I had to add it back myself.

First of all, your XML file must begin with this on the first line:

Code: Select all

<?xml version="1.0"?>

what does that line DO anyways?

[AndyDufresne]

Edbeard's file was uploaded today I believe.


--Andy

[Appalachian]

Has the fix been made?

[edbeard]

Has the fix been made?

yes it has.

[rgbubba]

Thanks to all for your help in resolving these issues. I hope the next time it will be done better.

[scottp]

RG, thanks for all the work that went into this map. It's one of my favorites.

Hate to bring up a negative, but isn't that Longhorn emblem you're using the copyrighted mark that the University of Texas holds? They do aggressively protect their mark. Just FYI.

[rgbubba]

RG, thanks for all the work that went into this map. It's one of my favorites.

Hate to bring up a negative, but isn't that Longhorn emblem you're using the copyrighted mark that the University of Texas holds? They do aggressively protect their mark. Just FYI.

[scottp]

okay, cool.

thanks again for the effort. one of my very favorite maps, ESPECIALLY since the old classic and middle earth maps went poof!

[nolefan5311]

What does the community think about changing the XML and coding Austin as a starting neutral? As it is now, it is included in the randomly allocated territories, and is dropped in a majority of games, causing an unnecessary advantage to the player who drops it.

[rgbubba]

Please email me at rgbubba@yahoo.com for any issues you have on the Texan Wars! I might can fix the map!

[nolefan5311]

You fixing the map would require it to back into Beta phase, when we can just have the Foundry Foreman edit the XML. Are you opposed to the changes?

[chapcrap]

I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.

[nolefan5311]

I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.

That would require graphic changes to the map, which I'm not sure the mapmaker would be willing/able to do.

[chapcrap]

I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.

That would require graphic changes to the map, which I'm not sure the mapmaker would be willing/able to do.

Fine!!

I would be ok with it starting neutral.