Forum

by **Victor Sullivan** on Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:42 pm

I 100% believe the capitals should be neutral 2. I am actually quite impressed that they are used so much in games and I think it works really well (I would say the same about California's cities). Adjusting them to neutral 3's risk their being ignored for the most part.

-Sully

by **CJ Lues** on Sat Sep 17, 2011 2:38 pm

isaiah40 wrote:
Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.

I'm not opposed to changing them, but let's wait and see if anyone has complaints about them.

To be honest i like it the way it is now...! I don't see a problem with it being about the capitals...

Good job Isaiah! =D>

by **The Bison King** on Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:45 pm

A++++

This is one of my new favorites. This get's the Bison King Seal of approval.

by **Victor Sullivan** on Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:20 pm

This gets my seal of approval, too:

His name is Jeffrey.

-Sully

by **koontz1973** on Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:16 am

I like the capitals as they are. Small games they are not ignored but taken as opportunity arises and in large games, they are the easier bonus to grab. Leave them as they are.

This would be my seal of choice

His name is Sully :lol:

Likes fish and his mum.
Hates hunters and big bears.

by **The Bison King** on Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:48 pm

Though if I had one suggestion at this point it would be to lower the value of the Russian Federation bonus

by **Victor Sullivan** on Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:15 pm

The Bison King wrote:Though if I had one suggestion at this point it would be to lower the value of the Russian Federation bonus

Yes, I think the Russian Federation could be lowered 1, and the Han bonus increased 1.

-Sully

by **isaiah40** on Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:18 pm

Anybody else think this way? Speak now or forever hold your peace! :lol:

by **Victor Sullivan** on Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:21 pm

isaiah40 wrote:Anybody else think this way? Speak now or forever hold your peace!

Scratch the Han thing. I decided against it.

-Sully

by **Bruceswar** on Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:28 am

isaiah40 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:The legend is hard to read. Maybe a slight font change would make it much easier to read? Otherwise nice map.

Well everyone was happy with the font. I did try a whole bunch of other oriental fonts, but this one is much clearer and easier to read. I'll have to wait and see if anyone else has the same problem with it.

Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.

I'm not opposed to changing them, but let's wait and see if anyone has complaints about them.

Maybe it is only me about the legend... or maybe others are just not posting?

by **koontz1973** on Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:38 am

Bruceswar wrote:
isaiah40 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:The legend is hard to read. Maybe a slight font change would make it much easier to read? Otherwise nice map.

Well everyone was happy with the font. I did try a whole bunch of other oriental fonts, but this one is much clearer and easier to read. I'll have to wait and see if anyone else has the same problem with it.

Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.

I'm not opposed to changing them, but let's wait and see if anyone has complaints about them.

Maybe it is only me about the legend... or maybe others are just not posting?

It might be harder to read than some maps, but it is readable. I see no reason to change it and lose some of the maps flavour.

by **Flapcake** on Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:05 am

isaiah40 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:The legend is hard to read. Maybe a slight font change would make it much easier to read? Otherwise nice map.

Well everyone was happy with the font. I did try a whole bunch of other oriental fonts, but this one is much clearer and easier to read. I'll have to wait and see if anyone else has the same problem with it.

Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.

I'm not opposed to changing them, but let's wait and see if anyone has complaints about them.

I've played it a few times and I think it's a lot about the bonuses, I think cities are a little Seconda, but not that they should not be there, if they were removed there would definitely be missing something. 3 neutrals instead of 2. will also make it harder to conquer bonuses, and when it will be the same for everyone there will probably not happen so much about it, other than difficulty level increases a little bit

Overall a good functioning game, a pleasure to play it

by **eagleblade** on Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:57 pm

koontz1973 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
isaiah40 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:The legend is hard to read. Maybe a slight font change would make it much easier to read? Otherwise nice map.

Well everyone was happy with the font. I did try a whole bunch of other oriental fonts, but this one is much clearer and easier to read. I'll have to wait and see if anyone else has the same problem with it.

Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.

I'm not opposed to changing them, but let's wait and see if anyone has complaints about them.

Maybe it is only me about the legend... or maybe others are just not posting?

It might be harder to read than some maps, but it is readable. I see no reason to change it and lose some of the maps flavour.

same with me

by **thenobodies80** on Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:42 am

So this is the only thing to fix?

Victor Sullivan wrote:
The Bison King wrote:Though if I had one suggestion at this point it would be to lower the value of the Russian Federation bonus

Yes, I think the Russian Federation could be lowered 1, and the Han bonus increased 1.

If this is the case, go with it mate. It seems a reasonable request to me.