Moderator: Cartographers
Gilligan wrote:2013-08-15 22:28:07 - Seamus76 assaulted G. Miguel Oquendo M1 from Triumph Bow and conquered it from Gilligan
should this be able to happen? I understand from the legend that you are only able to assault your own monarch, not others?
Gilligan wrote:Game 13101811
Gilligan wrote:I will have to give it another runthrough. There's just so much to this one!
cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:I will have to give it another runthrough. There's just so much to this one!
Gilligan
we know that all those other aspecets appear to be working apart from the errors, so why not just check the errors
1. Margate LB
2. the conditionals to command ship
Gilligan wrote:cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:I will have to give it another runthrough. There's just so much to this one!
Gilligan
we know that all those other aspecets appear to be working apart from the errors, so why not just check the errors
1. Margate LB
2. the conditionals to command ship
Yeah, that's what I mean There may be a few bombardments missing here or there, but those'll pop up as we go. I feel like MOST of them are there. Tricky to get 100% of them when it's two territs away.
kizkiz wrote:Game 13106879
* player game
First turn all but 1 player has a deploy of 4
It's foggy, but someone has posted that they had the SS bonus
Have i just had a bit of bad luck or is it an uneven drop?
TaelS wrote:There is a typo.
It's not "Neustra Señora del Barrio", but "Nuestra Señora del Barrio".
Also, "Senora" should be "Señora", with "ñ", not "n".
Also, "Sãn Mateo". It should be either "San Mateo" (Spanish) or "São Mateo" (Portuguese, if I'm not mistaken).
cairnswk wrote:TaelS wrote:There is a typo.
It's not "Neustra Señora del Barrio", but "Nuestra Señora del Barrio".
Also, "Senora" should be "Señora", with "ñ", not "n".
Also, "Sãn Mateo". It should be either "San Mateo" (Spanish) or "São Mateo" (Portuguese, if I'm not mistaken).
Taels, could you provide reference for those changes please
TaelS wrote:cairnswk wrote:TaelS wrote:There is a typo.
It's not "Neustra Señora del Barrio", but "Nuestra Señora del Barrio".
Also, "Senora" should be "Señora", with "ñ", not "n".
Also, "Sãn Mateo". It should be either "San Mateo" (Spanish) or "São Mateo" (Portuguese, if I'm not mistaken).
Taels, could you provide reference for those changes please
Sorry, my first time here and I don't know what you mean with reference.
If you mean where they are:
Sãn Mateo is one of the 3 first territories if you start with D. Medina Sedonia (m2 in your map of the first post).
Neustra Senora del Barrio is one of the 3 first territories if you start with C. Flores de Valdés (s2 in your map of the first post).
Ah, just because it has no sense at all as it is right now : PGilligan wrote:TaelS wrote:cairnswk wrote:TaelS wrote:There is a typo.
It's not "Neustra Señora del Barrio", but "Nuestra Señora del Barrio".
Also, "Senora" should be "Señora", with "ñ", not "n".
Also, "Sãn Mateo". It should be either "San Mateo" (Spanish) or "São Mateo" (Portuguese, if I'm not mistaken).
Taels, could you provide reference for those changes please
Sorry, my first time here and I don't know what you mean with reference.
If you mean where they are:
Sãn Mateo is one of the 3 first territories if you start with D. Medina Sedonia (m2 in your map of the first post).
Neustra Senora del Barrio is one of the 3 first territories if you start with C. Flores de Valdés (s2 in your map of the first post).
I believe he means why you think the text should be changed
TaelS wrote:....Ah, just because it has no sense at all as it is right now : P
Señora:
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=se%C3%B1ora (as you can see there, "Nuestra Señora" means "Virgin" in Spanish).
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=senora
Nuestra:
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=nuestra
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=neustra
San:
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=san
http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=S%C3%A3n
TaelS wrote:Sorry, but those are the only references I knew : P (besides my own knowledge, of course, but you didn't accept it : P).
Jippd wrote:I have some questions about the legend:
"Bow and Stern separately border adjacent ships". What are the ships adjacent to bow and stern? Take Santa Anna for example. Do you mean a region like el sanson?
"non-white sections are impassable". There are a lot of non white sections for example EYS A,B,C,D I would consider these non white regions. However from looking at the map they don't look like impassables to me. Looking for some clarification. As far as I can see for non passable borders you have forests, blue shaded areas (Looks like water to me), and thick black lines around the stern & bow.
....
cairnswk wrote:Jippd wrote:I have some questions about the legend:
"Bow and Stern separately border adjacent ships". What are the ships adjacent to bow and stern? Take Santa Anna for example. Do you mean a region like el sanson?
Yes.
El Sanson is adjacent to the bow...Santa Marta and Urca Doncella are adjacent to the stern."non-white sections are impassable". There are a lot of non white sections for example EYS A,B,C,D I would consider these non white regions. However from looking at the map they don't look like impassables to me. Looking for some clarification. As far as I can see for non passable borders you have forests, blue shaded areas (Looks like water to me), and thick black lines around the stern & bow.
....
This comes under the section in the legend of "Command Ships" therefore i would assume from reading it, it applies to Command Ships.
I'll answer the rest soon.
codierose wrote:hell this map makes my head spin. just one small thing Plymouth, Truro and the eddystone not really in the right places
Jippd wrote:...
Conditional border. Is it true that you need to hold bow and stern of the same respective monarch shield to be able to attack that monarch. I read back 2 pages in this thread but don't have time to read all of the pages to look for the answer. I saw there was some confusion about this. From what I understand from your post a few up it is currently broken and any stern/bow can attack any monarch but the XML upload that is now ready will fix the error. If it is true that you need the same stern and bow with the same shield can only attack that monarch I would consider re wording. Perhaps something along the lines of "Each Monarch commander can only be attacked by the respective stern or bow of the same earn. Must hold both stern and bow of the respective earn." or something along those lines. The way bob shows it to me is that any stern or bow can attack any monarch commander which is giving me confusion that I can't decipher with the key.
The monarch commander is a treasury region right? So If I am playing a quads game and eliminate a colors two regions besides their monarch commander and their bow/stern then they would die? IE if they have Don Diego Madrano and I kill their Diana and SS before they go then they would die because they would meet the losing condition?
Is whether a player starts with S or B of a certain earn pre decided or random with the drop? (Taels gave me this link: http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... utrals.jpg) for the starting positions.
I have an issue with the bombardment description. When you say a territory has a bombardment range of 2 to me that means it can bombard ANY region UP TO 2 reigons away. Including adjacent regions. It also says "ship region, army and land base". Should it say "ship region, supply ship and land base"? The word army is what is confusing me. Perhaps reword to "Each ship region, supply ship or land base may bombard any region 2 spaces away" instead of saying it has "range of 2"
Under the Treasury description area. It states "Each Monarch's Commander can also assault from any Treasury "T" region to same....." Above this description you describe the reigon listed as M as the monarch's commander. Then using that region in the description for the assault that the T's can make is confusing. The way you have it listed is that the Monarch's commander is doing the assaulting. It is not though as that region cannot assault SS/LB. I would shorten it to " Any Treasury "T" region can assault the LB, SS or command ship of the same earn".
In some places you refer to the Stern and bow combo in two different ways. You say "command ship" and "commanders ship". I think for consistency and clarity it would be better to pick one or the other and use it everywhere.
I am using "Earn" here because that is what is listed above the banners/shields. Is earn a foreign word of similar meaning?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users