Forum

by **porkenbeans** on Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:12 pm

Thank you very much RJ.
I would love to work on this project. However, I think that mibi should be in charge of it. Our history is not that great, so I do not know if he would be willing. But if he is, I will be more than glad to get to work as soon as I see some gameplay worked out.

by **mibi** on Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:47 pm

porkenbeans wrote:Thank you very much RJ.
I would love to work on this project. However, I think that mibi should be in charge of it. Our history is not that great, so I do not know if he would be willing. But if he is, I will be more than glad to get to work as soon as I see some gameplay worked out.

looks great, I authorize porkenbeans to do what ever he likes for Siege II and use the Siege name as well.

by **fumandomuerte** on Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:41 pm

mibi wrote:
porkenbeans wrote:Thank you very much RJ.
I would love to work on this project. However, I think that mibi should be in charge of it. Our history is not that great, so I do not know if he would be willing. But if he is, I will be more than glad to get to work as soon as I see some gameplay worked out.

looks great, I authorize porkenbeans to do what ever he likes for Siege II and use the Siege name as well.

I take my hat off at you mibi 8-)

by **porkenbeans** on Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:24 pm

OK mibi, sounds great. I have started a new thread for Siege II here - viewtopic.php?f=63&t=114701&p=2545724#p2545335
I hope that you will be involved, and offer your feedback.

by **gundiesalvo** on Thu May 27, 2010 9:00 am

ManBungalow wrote:I just bumped this to raise a point about the +1 bonus of the Throne. The immediate advantage provided by holding the Throne largley puts me off of playing this map. If the Throne were set to be neutral at the beginning of the game then it wouldn't affect any existing games. Hell, it could even be a neutral drop of 2 if you think that an imposing neutral 3 would make the Throne + Great hall bonus pair obsolete.

I just recently played this map for the first time, first in a 1v1, then in an 8v8, on the 1v1, throne started neutral, so I didn´t think much of it, but then on the 8v8 someone started with that +1 bonus, now since it´s an escalating 8-player game, it basically doesn´t matter, but I think the map would be more balanced and it would make more sense if Throne always started neutral.

by **nolefan5311** on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:20 pm

What does the community think about coding the XML so that the Throne is coded to be a starting neutral and not included in the random allocation of territories?

by **Gilligan** on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:21 pm

nolefan5311 wrote:What does the community think about coding the XML so that the Throne is coded to be a starting neutral and not included in the random allocation of territories?

Good. Same with Montreal.

by **nolefan5311** on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:23 pm

And Texan Wars. I will post in the Montreal thread too, see what people think. Any other maps you can think that have this problem?

by **Gilligan** on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:29 pm

nolefan5311 wrote:And Texan Wars. I will post in the Montreal thread too, see what people think. Any other maps you can think that have this problem?

Malta - Valetta. Same situation as the first three mentioned
Madness - Dog House
WWII Gazala - Free French

There are a few that might be able to use a tweak with 2-territ bonuses.