Kingdom of Denmark [Quenched]

[chapcrap]

I like the latest gameplay update. I'll probably play the map more because of it.

[Flapcake]

I like the latest gameplay update. I'll probably play the map more because of it.

Thx chapcrap

[Mightor]

Finally the map of Denmark came forward - very much wanted and valued - great work, dudes :-)
I have created some foggy maps and I discovered that it is shown to all players which player has captured which shield. I think the idea of a foggy game is missed, then. Could you do anything about that, pls.
But keep up the great work, mates.
Playful regards
Mightor

[koontz1973]

Looked at your games and do you mean in the game log it shows the deployment of 2 for holding a shield? If you do, then nothing can be done as this is the way the log works.

If not, can you give a game number and clearer description of what it is so I can look into it.

[Mightor]

I this game I can see that yellow has 2 shields - in other games I see other players conquerrings of shields.
I wonder if the other players may see the same picture as I do ?

Game: Game 10701396
Four Cities ==> Ålborg(3) [2] Århus(?) [2] Esbjerg(?) [2] Odense(9) [2] København(6) [2]

Regards
Mightor

[isaiah40]

You see that yellow has 2 shields, but which ones? The game log will always tell you how many troops each player gets, but not what territories each player gets. As koontz said, there is nothing that can be done about it. Plus I see you are using BOB, and as far as I know BOB doesn't show you which player has which city in foggy games.

[natty dread]

I just now noticed a small graphical flaw: the dark inner glow of the land area seems to be missing between randers / viborg.

[Flapcake]

I just now noticed a small graphical flaw: the dark inner glow of the land area seems to be missing between randers / viborg.

Its no flaw, its made like that on on purpose, its a river/impassable

[natty dread]

"It's not a bug, it's a feature", right?

The thing is, since it's the only "river" on the map, there's really no context to separate rivers from other bodies of water, so it just looks like another piece of water... so it'd be good if it was consistent with the other waters.

[Flapcake]

"It's not a bug, it's a feature" Yes your rigth

We are here in the category of taste and "cant take my eyes away details" in reality the water dont comes down that far in that area, but for the gameplay some impasable was needed, and what was more natural that make the "river/water" extended, therefor it looks like it does, I just didten added the white line to it, not by any fault but it was just the way I draw it.

If the foundry are upset of the missing sea foam, Im happy to add it, no sweat

[chapcrap]

I agree with natty. It would look better if it was the same as the other water.

[natty dread]

I'm not talking about the water's colour, I mean the dark glow on the edge of the land.

[Flapcake]

I'm not talking about the water's colour, I mean the dark glow on the edge of the land.

ahh the shade well thats supposed to be that way too (cough cough)

[natty dread]

Come on, no it's not...

[Flapcake]

Come on, no it's not...

Il sort it out ASAP