Page 25 of 30

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 10:08 pm
by Foreverman
Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 10:19 pm
by isaiah40
Thank you for commenting, and we do know about it. The XML has been fixed, along with the small map, we are just waiting for rds to upload them. :)

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:38 pm
by random21
capitals 5 and 20. comes up as san francisco instead of sacranmento, and charleston instead of 33 columbia fort interstate bonus. unless i am mistaken

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:58 pm
by Gilligan
random21 wrote:capitals 5 and 20. comes up as san francisco instead of sacranmento, and charleston instead of 33 columbia fort interstate bonus. unless i am mistaken


Yes, good call! I will fix this in the next update.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 7:35 am
by Awoodness
Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.


I didn't notice that, but I got Des Moines can not attack Albert Lea, but Albert Lea can attack Des Moines

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 9:51 am
by isaiah40
Awoodness wrote:
Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.


I didn't notice that, but I got Des Moines can not attack Albert Lea, but Albert Lea can attack Des Moines

Oooopps! Fixed for the next update.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 5:52 pm
by t4mcr53s2
Thanks for the map ... fun to see how it plays ...

today Des Moines could not see Albert Lea

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 9:27 pm
by greenoaks
why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 9:34 pm
by Gilligan
greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?


NYC isn't the capital of New York. Albany is.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:33 pm
by greenoaks
Gilligan wrote:
greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?


NYC isn't the capital of New York. Albany is.

that makes sense. :oops:

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat May 11, 2013 10:49 am
by JeopardyTempest
Seems the army numbers for 38 (Augusta, GA) is left of where it should be, at least for me. At least in fog as ??.

Also, any thoughts on making Michigan +4 instead of +3? It's 8 territories, and 3 borders. Yes, it's low on borders, but seems like a throwaway territory right now. Though I could see some reasoning, I've found MN\WI to be a great opening move so far.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 2:41 am
by benga
This map hurts my eyes too much, other big maps aren't that eye annoying.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:52 am
by Gilligan
benga wrote:This map hurts my eyes too much, other big maps aren't that eye annoying.


IMO kings court Ii is more annoying.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 2:13 pm
by Mr_Adams
somewhere between V2 and V3 my home town disappeared. :(

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2013 3:24 pm
by iancanton
JeopardyTempest wrote:Seems the army numbers for 38 (Augusta, GA) is left of where it should be, at least for me. At least in fog as ??.

u're right, the troop count is too far left.

JeopardyTempest wrote:Also, any thoughts on making Michigan +4 instead of +3? It's 8 territories, and 3 borders. Yes, it's low on borders, but seems like a throwaway territory right now. Though I could see some reasoning, I've found MN\WI to be a great opening move so far.

michigan has only 2 border cities: ironwood and goshen. despite this, there is an argument for making michigan +4 if it turns out that no-one ever wants this bonus when it's +3. this is worth considering, especially when compared with south carolina, which is an easier +3.

anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.

ian. :)

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 12:17 am
by jefjef
Why didn't you make Iowa actually look like Iowa? (Instead of looking like Arkansas)

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2013 11:07 am
by hotfire
why is minneapolis where fargo should be...and why is duluth so far from lake superior...in fact why is there no lake superior?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:48 am
by Mishalex
There is a little mistake on the map, the troops on Augusta are not in the circle, but just at the left of it...

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:48 am
by joxter14
I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:38 pm
by random21
i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?

leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:56 am
by greenoaks
where is USA 2.0 ?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:57 pm
by iancanton
hotfire wrote:why is minneapolis where fargo should be...and why is duluth so far from lake superior...in fact why is there no lake superior?

that was my fault! i asked isaiah to put in minneapolis, since it's by far the most famous city in minnesota and probably the only one that most foreigners can name. the current location is the only place available for minneapolis, without moving saint paul.

joxter14 wrote:I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.

iancanton wrote:anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.

already noted! i'm sure that isaiah will change this in his next xml update, along with any other fixes that come to light.

random21 wrote:i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?

leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily

other cities, such as berlin and augusta, also have twins in other states. i suggest that, in game chat, u use buffalo ny and buffalo wy to avoid confusion.

ian. :)

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:55 am
by venom7878
Very minor, but i believe Pendleton, Oregon is typo'd on the actual map.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 1:45 pm
by Iron Maid
Why is Tuscon on the map? Never heard of that city. Maybe confused with Tucson? ;)