Page 28 of 30

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:04 pm
by TheFlashPoint
isaiah40 wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:1) holding the capitals of minnesota and iowa seems to give a +4 bonus. If this is intended to be a subsidy for occupying those states, novices would benefit from having this information up front.

It is actually +3 - +1 for holding 2 capitals, and +2 for holding capitals on an interstate


Whenever I hold the capitals of Minnesota and Iowa, the map gives me "+4 for holding capitals along hwy 35".

Ive also previously received a +6 for capitals along 95 when only holding 5 capitals.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:39 pm
by Gilligan
TheFlashPoint wrote:
isaiah40 wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:1) holding the capitals of minnesota and iowa seems to give a +4 bonus. If this is intended to be a subsidy for occupying those states, novices would benefit from having this information up front.

It is actually +3 - +1 for holding 2 capitals, and +2 for holding capitals on an interstate


Whenever I hold the capitals of Minnesota and Iowa, the map gives me "+4 for holding capitals along hwy 35".

Ive also previously received a +6 for capitals along 95 when only holding 5 capitals.


Well, remember that DC is a capital along 95.

<territory>Augusta (Maine)</territory>
<territory>Boston</territory>
<territory>Providence</territory>
<territory>Trenton</territory>
<territory>D.C.</territory>
<territory>Richmond</territory>
<territory>Raleigh</territory>

this is correct.

As far as 35,

<territory>Saint Paul</territory>
<territory>Des Moines</territory>
<territory>Oklahoma City</territory>
<territory>Austin</territory>

this is also correct. if you can show us in a game, that would be good because the XML shows it is correct.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:19 am
by TheFlashPoint
Gilligan wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:
isaiah40 wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:1) holding the capitals of minnesota and iowa seems to give a +4 bonus. If this is intended to be a subsidy for occupying those states, novices would benefit from having this information up front.

It is actually +3 - +1 for holding 2 capitals, and +2 for holding capitals on an interstate


Whenever I hold the capitals of Minnesota and Iowa, the map gives me "+4 for holding capitals along hwy 35".

Ive also previously received a +6 for capitals along 95 when only holding 5 capitals.


Well, remember that DC is a capital along 95.

<territory>Augusta (Maine)</territory>
<territory>Boston</territory>
<territory>Providence</territory>
<territory>Trenton</territory>
<territory>D.C.</territory>
<territory>Richmond</territory>
<territory>Raleigh</territory>

this is correct.

As far as 35,

<territory>Saint Paul</territory>
<territory>Des Moines</territory>
<territory>Oklahoma City</territory>
<territory>Austin</territory>

this is also correct. if you can show us in a game, that would be good because the XML shows it is correct.


I was counting DC.

Game 13564186 just gave me +4 along 35 and I only hold 3 of the 4 capitals. The game is foggy, but the bug seems easily and reliably reproducible in every game.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:42 am
by TheFlashPoint
Also just got the +4 in game 13569895 for just Des Moines and St Paul.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:07 am
by Gilligan
TheFlashPoint wrote:Also just got the +4 in game 13569895 for just Des Moines and St Paul.


Going to need a screenshot because as I said, the XML is proper.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:37 am
by isaiah40
Gilligan wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:Also just got the +4 in game 13569895 for just Des Moines and St Paul.


Going to need a screenshot because as I said, the XML is proper.

You can pm the screenshot to Gilligan TheFlashPoint.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:19 pm
by TheFlashPoint
Wow, Ive had easier times getting customer service from call center workers.

Im afraid we're going in circles here. I came to report a bug, have repeated all the relevant info, and have now reached the limits of my interest and patience.

Its a wonderful map, congratulations! Best of luck with the rest of it.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:24 pm
by Gilligan
TheFlashPoint wrote:Wow, Ive had easier times getting customer service from call center workers.

Im afraid we're going in circles here. I came to report a bug, have repeated all the relevant info, and have now reached the limits of my interest and patience.

Its a wonderful map, congratulations! Best of luck with the rest of it.


I'm sorry, you have not repeated all of the relevant info. If I can't see the map, how can I confirm that it isn't working properly?

It's part of the procedure to provide a screenshot to make sure that 1) it is indeed a bug, or 2) you are making a mistake somewhere and I can tell you exactly what that is.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:28 pm
by isaiah40
Gilligan wrote:
TheFlashPoint wrote:Wow, Ive had easier times getting customer service from call center workers.

Im afraid we're going in circles here. I came to report a bug, have repeated all the relevant info, and have now reached the limits of my interest and patience.

Its a wonderful map, congratulations! Best of luck with the rest of it.


I'm sorry, you have not repeated all of the relevant info. If I can't see the map, how can I confirm that it isn't working properly?

It's part of the procedure to provide a screenshot to make sure that 1) it is indeed a bug, or 2) you are making a mistake somewhere and I can tell you exactly what that is.

Exactly! Now if you can please provide a screenshot to Gilligan and myself so we can take a look at it. If customer service asks you to provide more information, and you don't provide the necessary info, how do you expect them to help you? We are asking for more information so we can help you.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:26 pm
by Gilligan
Okay, I've found the problem with route 35. Here is the fix for upload.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:46 pm
by random21
when did green/blue planes non capital neutrals become 5 stacks?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:10 pm
by isaiah40
random21 wrote:when did green/blue planes non capital neutrals become 5 stacks?

They've been that way for a while now. They were coded wrong from the beginning. The OP has all the values listed.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:50 pm
by thenobodies80
Gilligan wrote:Okay, I've found the problem with route 35. Here is the fix for upload.


This is available for testing

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 9:42 am
by Orange-Idaho-Dog
I'm sure it's been noted somewhere already, but the numbers need to be re-centered. With the bonus issue I'm sure this falls low on the priority list, it's just my OCD bothering me when I look at this map. :lol:

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 10:02 am
by Gilligan
Orange-Idaho-Dog wrote:I'm sure it's been noted somewhere already, but the numbers need to be re-centered. With the bonus issue I'm sure this falls low on the priority list, it's just my OCD bothering me when I look at this map. :lol:


What numbers?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 10:16 pm
by isaiah40
Orange-Idaho-Dog wrote:I'm sure it's been noted somewhere already, but the numbers need to be re-centered. With the bonus issue I'm sure this falls low on the priority list, it's just my OCD bothering me when I look at this map. :lol:

If you are meaning the numbers when you have less than 3 digits (2 with the color code turned on) then no they are that way on purpose. I had the 3 digit numbers centered in the ovals because in most places the numbers are on top of the interstates, I did it this way on purpose.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:45 am
by Orange-Idaho-Dog
Oh, alright. It just looks weird with single digits is all.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:13 am
by luxCRUSADER
I am so LOVING this map :D
God bless you Isaiah :)
Wonderful job !

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:16 pm
by Vlademir
Playing in http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=13568629.
Noticing that we're only getting the +1 bonus for the first pair of State Capitals.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:02 pm
by Gilligan
Vlademir wrote:Playing in http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=13568629.
Noticing that we're only getting the +1 bonus for the first pair of State Capitals.


2013-12-15 14:47:54 - Vlademir received 2 troops for holding State Capitals

?

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:16 am
by isaiah40
Gilligan wrote:
Vlademir wrote:Playing in http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=13568629.
Noticing that we're only getting the +1 bonus for the first pair of State Capitals.


2013-12-15 14:47:54 - Vlademir received 2 troops for holding State Capitals

?

Gilly, you missed this:
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Arkansas (AR)
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 3 troops for holding Oklahoma (OK)
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 1 troops for holding State Capitals
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Capitals on Route 35
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Capitals on Route 40

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:58 pm
by Vlademir
isaiah40 wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
Vlademir wrote:Playing in http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=13568629.
Noticing that we're only getting the +1 bonus for the first pair of State Capitals.


2013-12-15 14:47:54 - Vlademir received 2 troops for holding State Capitals

?

Gilly, you missed this:
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Arkansas (AR)
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 3 troops for holding Oklahoma (OK)
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 1 troops for holding State Capitals
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Capitals on Route 35
2013-12-15 15:08:19 - Pershing received 2 troops for holding Capitals on Route 40


My bad, I was following what was showing in the Statistics section - that's only reporting 1, but I now that the actual received is correct.
Regarding Pershing - he just took his 4th State Capital, so he'll get 2 next turn.

Thanks for clearing it up - only a cosmetic flaw.

Vlad

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:44 am
by thenobodies80
Anything else to do?
Everyone happy with this one as it is now?

Nobodies

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 11:59 pm
by hopalong
its great to have another large map, especially one of such a high caliber - congrats!

in game log, could the state be added after the city? as someone who is USA-geographically challenged, it takes quite some time to find which cities were lost.

thnx for the consideration.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 12:21 am
by Gilligan
hopalong wrote:its great to have another large map, especially one of such a high caliber - congrats!

in game log, could the state be added after the city? as someone who is USA-geographically challenged, it takes quite some time to find which cities were lost.

thnx for the consideration.


Yes, I have considered this and have not had the time to do such a big update. I can probably do this next week.

In the meantime you can use map indicators or built in bob :)