Conquer Club

Forza AZ wrote:

DiM wrote:i hope widow acts as quick as you did cause i'm in a game where a noob with 800 points is about to get some extra troops because of widow's mistake.

Bonusses are fixed now I just saw in the updated XML.

That was my error, although I have no idea how I screwed it up so bad. I'm sorry everyone.

Coleman wrote:

Forza AZ wrote:

DiM wrote:i hope widow acts as quick as you did cause i'm in a game where a noob with 800 points is about to get some extra troops because of widow's mistake.

Bonusses are fixed now I just saw in the updated XML.

That was my error, although I have no idea how I screwed it up so bad. I'm sorry everyone.

if i lose that game i want you to give back my points

DiM wrote:

Coleman wrote:

Forza AZ wrote:

DiM wrote:i hope widow acts as quick as you did cause i'm in a game where a noob with 800 points is about to get some extra troops because of widow's mistake.

Bonusses are fixed now I just saw in the updated XML.

That was my error, although I have no idea how I screwed it up so bad. I'm sorry everyone.

if i lose that game i want you to give back my points

Okay, make a game and I'll throw the match, lol. You need to prove you lost though.

EDIT: Aww crap, I'm going to get us in trouble again.

On Topic: How are people liking the map?

Nevermind.

Coleman wrote:

DiM wrote:

Coleman wrote:

Forza AZ wrote:

DiM wrote:i hope widow acts as quick as you did cause i'm in a game where a noob with 800 points is about to get some extra troops because of widow's mistake.

Bonusses are fixed now I just saw in the updated XML.

That was my error, although I have no idea how I screwed it up so bad. I'm sorry everyone.

if i lose that game i want you to give back my points

Okay, make a game and I'll throw the match, lol. You need to prove you lost though.

EDIT: Aww crap, I'm going to get us in trouble again.

On Topic: How are people liking the map?

Just had to post to congratulate you on a fantastic map. Really like the look and the playability (especially now the bonuses are right).

Snowman wrote:Just had to post to congratulate you on a fantastic map. Really like the look and the playability (especially now the bonuses are right).

Thanks. I hope everyone can enjoy it.

It's unclear what is meant by an adjacent lake. Take game 467801 as an example. Dlakavi is all set to win the game and deploys on Lake Superior to attack through Lake Michigan, yet is unable to do so. The two lakes are clearly adjacent to one another yet they are unconnected.
Is this a bug or are the two lakes not considered 'adjacent'?

Aside from this, I really like the map.

steve monkey wrote:It's unclear what is meant by an adjacent lake. Take game 467801 as an example. Dlakavi is all set to win the game and deploys on Lake Superior to attack through Lake Michigan, yet is unable to do so. The two lakes are clearly adjacent to one another yet they are unconnected.
Is this a bug or are the two lakes not considered 'adjacent'?

Aside from this, I really like the map.

i don't see them as adjacent. there's no connection between them

now I see what you mean. But if you're unfamiliar with north america it's not clear from the map that the other lakes are connected to one another.

Sorry guys if this has been answered before, but why did you decide on the Union Jack Flag on Canada? Some players where wondering the reasoning for it.

Ninja-Town wrote:Sorry guys if this has been answered before, but why did you decide on the Union Jack Flag on Canada? Some players where wondering the reasoning for it.

It's only on Ontario, and it is their state(province?) flag:

Thank you Guiscard. Let me know if you are up for any games.

DiM wrote:

steve monkey wrote:It's unclear what is meant by an adjacent lake. Take game 467801 as an example. Dlakavi is all set to win the game and deploys on Lake Superior to attack through Lake Michigan, yet is unable to do so. The two lakes are clearly adjacent to one another yet they are unconnected.
Is this a bug or are the two lakes not considered 'adjacent'?

Aside from this, I really like the map.

i don't see them as adjacent. there's no connection between them

I am not a native english speaker but i thought adjacent meant "when 2 things are next to each other"

The proper word fot the map should be "connected"

Dlakavi wrote:

DiM wrote:

steve monkey wrote:It's unclear what is meant by an adjacent lake. Take game 467801 as an example. Dlakavi is all set to win the game and deploys on Lake Superior to attack through Lake Michigan, yet is unable to do so. The two lakes are clearly adjacent to one another yet they are unconnected.
Is this a bug or are the two lakes not considered 'adjacent'?

Aside from this, I really like the map.

i don't see them as adjacent. there's no connection between them

I am not a native english speaker but i thought adjacent meant "when 2 things are next to each other"

The proper word fot the map should be "connected"

They are adjacent. They touch.
EDIT: 2007-10-20
They are adjacent? They touch? Sarcasm

Synonyms abutting, adjoining, bordering, contiguous, flanking, fringing, joining, juxtaposed, skirting, touching, verging.

I still don't see why anyone would think lake michigan could attack lake superior. There is a piece of land in between them.

The wording was discussed in the forum before the map was quenched. Sorry that there was a problem I have not heard of any other players having issues with this.

WidowMakers wrote:They are adjacent. They touch.

i'm looking at the great lakes map right now and i can't see any place where lake superior touches lake michigan. st ignace is in between. how can the lakes be adjacent? am i missing something?

ian.

iancanton wrote:

WidowMakers wrote:They are adjacent. They touch.

i'm looking at the great lakes map right now and i can't see any place where lake superior touches lake michigan. st ignace is in between. how can the lakes be adjacent? am i missing something?

ian.

I wrote that OVER 5 MONTHS AGO. I was trying to be sarcastic and should have put "?" after each sentence.

Plus read the rest of the post. I clearly say there is a piece of land in between.

Oh and Stop bumping dead threads.

sorry, i found this using a search and didn't look at the dates!

ian.

bump

this map stinks
cuz i lost on it

You're an idiot.

Similar to my request on AoM, can this XML be reduced?? By what I gathered from that thread, continents can't be included as components. But can territories??? If so, that would reduce this XML as well.

(By the way, I'm looking at creating a map with a friend, and I would be the one doing the XML, which is why I've been trying to pick up on things.)

This and World 2.1 are my favorite 2 maps

#1Buckeye wrote:This and World 2.1 are my favorite 2 maps

I am glad you like it.

/agree

This map is a beauty. Everything about it is exemplary of what CC maps should be. Bonuses are perfect, gameplay is perfect, there is excellent scope for moving around, and the graphics are outstanding. Well done WM and Coleman

I think I encountered a bug in this map while playing a doubles game. 'This is Game 5586032 round 4. I wanted to reinforce from Ottawa to Lake Erie. I held Ottawa and Cleveland. My partner held Toronto, Windsor, Buffalo, Erie, and Lake Erie. This creates a path. The map would let me reinforce to Toronto only. Is there another reason for this?