Page 19 of 30

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - credits added

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:54 pm
by chapcrap
Thanks for the credit. :)

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - update 12/07, page30

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:14 am
by cairnswk
cairnswk wrote:
Oneyed wrote:...
credits added. cairnswk just your batterfly is missing, so please add here somewhere :)
...
Oneyed

Oneyed. I'm happy with the credit given. butterfly not needed, thanks anyways. :)

Please be advised that you may have my credits from CC to dispose of as you wish...but wisely!

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - update 12/07, page30

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:14 am
by Oneyed
cairnswk wrote:Please be advised that you may have my credits from CC to dispose of as you wish...but wisely!


thanks. I already have this appeal.

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:51 am
by Oneyed
xml is done. anything more is needed? or just patience now :) ?

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:35 am
by cairnswk
Oneyed wrote:...or just patience now :) ?
Oneyed

Yes, that, patience.
I think the mods went on holidays over Xmas...seems that way anyways. ;)

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:22 pm
by Dukasaur
Prepare the champagne!

(Or slivovitz... :D )

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:28 am
by Oneyed
Dukasaur wrote:Prepare the champagne!

(Or slivovitz... :D )


slivovica (slivovice)/slivovitz is far, far better :lol:

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:02 pm
by Oneyed
I made a small graphics change. I add story to the map. do you think it is better?
Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:15 am
by x-raider
"During the year 1992, the Czech and Slovak Governments made the decision to divide the common state. The dissolution took effect on January 1st, 1993."

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:28 am
by Oneyed
thanks to cairnswk and x-raider for help with story text.

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:48 am
by cairnswk
Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:54 am
by Oneyed
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:28 pm
by nolefan5311
Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed


Change it to cairnswk suggestion. Also, you used "become" instead of "became", and that needs to be fixed as well. Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments decided to divide the common state into two independent countries, the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic, and on January 1, 1993, the two countries were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:36 pm
by cairnswk
Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed

Oneyed. I am still seeing a story which says "...become to valid..."

Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

I actually don't beleive this is necessary to elaborate...if people want to find out more there is always Google or other search engines.
The map is about fragmentation of said country...it has bonuses for both republics...therefore the result must be that the state was divided :)

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:40 pm
by Oneyed
nolefan5311 wrote:
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which went into effect on January 1, 1993. As a result, two independent countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia (or Slovak Republic) were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.


will care more about grammar ;)
I used during 1992 because it was long and complicated process. everything as finance, army... must be divided. and only in Jan 1, 1993 it was official and this is also date of creating new states Czech republic and Slovak republic.

so could we find any final version? thanks for help

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:43 pm
by nolefan5311
Oneyed wrote:
nolefan5311 wrote:
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which went into effect on January 1, 1993. As a result, two independent countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia (or Slovak Republic) were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.


will care more about grammar ;)
I used during 1992 because it was long and complicated process. everything as finance, army... must be divided. and only in Jan 1, 1993 it was official and this is also date of creating new states Czech republic and Slovak republic.

so could we find any final version? thanks for help

Oneyed


See my edited post above. I think everyone understands that it was a complicated process and not something that was done in 1 day. "During" just doesn't sound right though.

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:43 pm
by nolefan5311
cairnswk wrote:
Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed

Oneyed. I am still seeing a story which says "...become to valid..."

Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

I actually don't beleive this is necessary to elaborate...if people want to find out more there is always Google or other search engines.
The map is about fragmentation of said country...it has bonuses for both republics...therefore the result must be that the state was divided :)


Well then why put the sentence in there at all then?

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:13 pm
by cairnswk
nolefan5311 wrote:...
Well then why put the sentence in there at all then?

It's a lead in story.

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:21 pm
by Jippd
I can't find cairnswk's version.

I like xraiders though:
"During the year 1992 the Czech and Slovak Governments made the decision to divide the common state. The dissolution took effect on January 1st, 1993."

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:34 pm
by Oneyed
ok. could we gowith this version? I can have it not too long...

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:41 pm
by nolefan5311
Oneyed wrote:ok. could we gowith this version? I can have it not too long...

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed


"...to divide the common state."

And it's "dissolution". You have an extra "on" on the end of it. Why don't you just make it "division", since you use "divide" in the previous sentence?

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 31

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:29 pm
by Oneyed
Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 31

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:34 pm
by Gilligan
Hello Oneyed/cairns,

I checked your XML and found an error.

On the map, it reads: Region and 2 towns inside its border, +4 for every 2 Kraj (similar to SR part of map).
In the XML, it stops at 2 Kraj. Are you not supposed to be given a +8 bonus if you have 4 Kraj?

Similar to capital: +1 for every 4 towns in CR, -1 for each Kraj in SR.
This bonus also stops at 4 towns and 1 Kraj. Should you not be given +2 for 8 towns in CR, and -2 for each Kraj in SR, held along with the capital? Example, if I hold Bratislava and 4 CR Kraj, according to current XML I get -2, but the way I read it you should get -4.

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 32

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:09 pm
by Oneyed
cairns could you check xml ones more? it looks that Giligan is right.
also borders for Praha are: Kladno, Beroun, Tábor, StČK
and borders for Bratislava are: Kúty, Trenčín, Nitra, ZSK

is it not clear that capital could be attacked from region it is located in and from towns in the same region and from towns adjacent by railway?

thanks Giligan

Oneyed

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 32

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:31 pm
by cairnswk
On it guys.

Gilligan, are u saying i need to go to overrides?