Page 12 of 15

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [19.12.12] V27-P18 Gold Ring

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:19 pm
by Funkyterrance
I don't get the lighting complaint? I feel like even if there were different angles of light it would fall into the whole "jewel" theme anyways. I have to say I just don't see a problem and I am one picky SOB. :P

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [19.12.12] V27-P18 Gold Ring

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:34 pm
by cairnswk
Funkyterrance wrote:I don't get the lighting complaint? I feel like even if there were different angles of light it would fall into the whole "jewel" theme anyways. I have to say I just don't see a problem and I am one picky SOB. :P

well FT...you know, some people just can't help themselves :lol: :lol:

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [22.12.12] V27-P18 L & S

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:16 am
by cairnswk
Large and Small uploaded as above V27.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [22.12.12] V27-P18 L & S

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:40 pm
by cairnswk
Goodness. PS is bloody nightmare to use. :evil: :roll: :roll:

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L & S

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:30 pm
by cairnswk
Post deleted for below.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L & S

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:40 am
by cairnswk
Version 28 Small and Large.

1. All gold images now have the same lighting...completely re-worked in illustrator and imported as .pngs to CD
2. title re-worked
3. image holders re-worked
4. impassables re-worked
5. the back frame is not going to be done in the same gold effect as the other gold title and image holders, as it would be too much for the eye and over-ride the map.
6. i hope this now satisfies for stamping. :)

Image

Click image to enlarge.
image


Image

Image

Click image to enlarge.
image


http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/12/21 ... Moscow.xml

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:10 am
by isaiah40
Merry Christmas!!
Image

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:40 am
by cairnswk
isaiah40 wrote:Merry Christmas!!
Image


Thank-you isaiah 40, and a Merry Xmas to you also, :)

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:45 am
by koontz1973
Well done cairns. Another one close to the gaming stage.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [24.12.12] V28-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:48 am
by cairnswk
XML posted for checking.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:05 am
by cairnswk

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:24 am
by koontz1973
cairnswk wrote:Version 29
Sparkles on the diamonds


Not liking them. Try to lower the opacity on them. The sparkles are only light and should be able to see through them.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P19 L/S/XML

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:37 am
by cairnswk
koontz1973 wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Version 29
Sparkles on the diamonds


Not liking them. Try to lower the opacity on them. The sparkles are only light and should be able to see through them.

Opacity lowered to 80% with ADD transaparency operation...any lower than that and they become invisible.
For effect, i think being able to see through them is not important, what is important is the effect given :) slight as it is!

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:16 am
by Funkyterrance
I love the sparkles! I saw koontz post and was bummed because I thought they were going to go away but then noticed they had already been changed. Now I just wonder if I would have liked them when they were sparklier. I guess I will never know. :D

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:29 am
by koontz1973
No worries FT, you got to see the perfect ones. Well done cairns.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:15 pm
by iancanton
i'm going to pull u up on spelling again! sevemoe tushino ought to be severnoe tushino. i suspect that meshchanskoye is actually meshchanskoe if u use the same transliteration method as for the other names that have the -skoe ending. tverskoe is tverskoy, segovoy is almost certainly begovoy, while presnensoe is probably presnenskiy.

the text for mostilmovskiy isn't lined up properly on the small map, so that the second mo is slightly higher than the v that follows it.

cairnswk wrote:
iancanton wrote:must u have the dots in the abbreviations for the inner suburbs? they make the centre of the map a bit untidy.

ian. :)

I don't think it is untidy. and since most often that is the way abbreviations are noted...i think they're OK.
otherwise do you have an alternative suggestion ?

the numerous abbreviation dots remain a minor irritant, though i can live with them. the only suggestion i have is to remove the dots, in the fashion of Qld for queensland, NSW for new south wales and UK for united kingdom.

the sparkle effect on the diamonds is a nice touch.

ian. :)

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:05 pm
by cairnswk
Oh my god it's the spelling nazi again :lol:

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:12 pm
by cairnswk
iancanton wrote:i'm going to pull u up on spelling again!

Shame i can't pull you up for not having picked these up long ago...and why they're not all given at once rather than in dribs and drabs. :idea: for you eh?!

Many of these as you know are taken from another reference map.
So there is always going to be discrepancy on what you want and what mapmakers put on their maps when referred to from other people's work.

sevemoe tushino ought to be severnoe tushino.
This one is a reading error from the other map - the close font letters are repsonsible.
Fixed.



tverskoe is tverskoy,

Changed.
segovoy is almost certainly begovoy,

Fixed.

while presnensoe is probably presnenskiy.
yes if you look at google...but who says google is correct :?:
changed


the text for mostilmovskiy isn't lined up properly on the small map, so that the second mo is slightly higher than the v that follows it.

fixed.


i suspect that meshchanskoye is actually meshchanskoe if u use the same transliteration method as for the other names that have the -skoe ending.

No, Meschanskiye is correct...according to google

you forgot to look at Basmannoe...should be Basmannyy according to google
and Krasnoselskoe should be Krasnosel'skaya according to google.
and Bogorodskoe should be Bogorodskoye according to google.
and Taganskoe should be Taganskiy according to google.
and Sokolniki should be Sokol'niki

Quick. let's all go over to google maps to make sure out maps are all correct from now on ;)

cairnswk wrote:
iancanton wrote:must u have the dots in the abbreviations for the inner suburbs? they make the centre of the map a bit untidy.
ian. :)

I don't think it is untidy. and since most often that is the way abbreviations are noted...i think they're OK.
otherwise do you have an alternative suggestion ?

the numerous abbreviation dots remain a minor irritant, though i can live with them. the only suggestion i have is to remove the dots, in the fashion of Qld for queensland, NSW for new south wales and UK for united kingdom.

ian, let's not keep going round in circles with the dots. I want them there, you can live with that, so let's get over your minor irritation.
as for your references for qld nsw etc. they can also be used with dots....e.g n.s.w. and u.k.
I think you're being pendantic for pendantic sake. :roll:

the sparkle effect on the diamonds is a nice touch.
ian. :)

ah! wonderful you find some positive.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:26 pm
by cairnswk

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [28.12.12] V29-P20 Bling!

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:27 pm
by Funkyterrance
koontz1973 wrote:No worries FT, you got to see the perfect ones. Well done cairns.


That's good enough for me. ;)

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:48 pm
by nolefan5311
cairns, are you waiting on me to post the XML? It says the attachment above has been deactivated, or something weird.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:32 pm
by cairnswk
nolefan5311 wrote:cairns, are you waiting on me to post the XML? It says the attachment above has been deactivated, or something weird.

NO, i wrote you that Moscow was wrapped up...remember this in the PM i sent you....
Moscow is dusted and ready for checking,

It is awaiting checking in the xml thread.

As for the above attachment, who knows what causes that unless there is some sort of expiry on it, so it is attached below.

PS. Seems that function has been deactivated...so this now becomes a high up issue.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:38 pm
by cairnswk
Seems the upload function is working again...thanks whoever. :)

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:19 pm
by Gilligan
Hello (again) cairns, and nole:

1) Meshchanskiy on map, Meshchanskoye in XML (not going to guess which is right, :lol:) Same with inner territory.
2) This is only a matter of preference, but regarding the bonus Tsentralny, perhaps put this: Tsentralny Without Inner Ring instead of just Without Inner Ring. Same with Inner, but again it's a matter of preference...I think it'd be weird to see "Gilligan received 8 armies for holding Without Inner Ring", just a bit awkward.

Other than that, looks good.

Re: CLASSIC CITIES: Moscow [30.12.12] V30-P20 XML

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:47 pm
by cairnswk
Gilligan wrote:Hello (again) cairns, and nole:

1) Meshchanskiy on map, Meshchanskoye in XML (not going to guess which is right, :lol:) Same with inner territory.
2) This is only a matter of preference, but regarding the bonus Tsentralny, perhaps put this: Tsentralny Without Inner Ring instead of just Without Inner Ring. Same with Inner, but again it's a matter of preference...I think it'd be weird to see "Gilligan received 8 armies for holding Without Inner Ring", just a bit awkward.

Other than that, looks good.


Fixed in below adjustment Gilligan, thanks.

Version 30.

Image

Click image to enlarge.
image


http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... utrals.png

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... w_V30S.png
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... w_V30L.png
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/12/21 ... Moscow.xml