cairnswk wrote:Any more votes in this prelim poll....?
Cmon show the map its June 30!
zeppelin90 wrote:i'd like a poll to vote no against the idea We have a lot of ancient battle type maps in progress and this idea doesn't impress me. Maybe it's that history bores me a bit -- but i think the majority of people would like maps that appeal to a greater mass.
IMO please dont rag on me
Ruben Cassar wrote:I think that his name should be Octavianus and not Octavius at this time.
Another thing, wouldn't it be better to name them O1, O2, O3, etc instead of Oa, Ob, Oc?
Ruben Cassar wrote:"Octavius also learned formally of his inheritance and adoption by the terms of Caesar's will, which had been broadcast by Marc Antony. By law, the adopted son of Caesar, Gaius Octavius, would now legally be known as Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus."
Source: http://web.mac.com/heraklia/Augustus/Oc ... index.html
This happened before the battle of Actium so at that time he was known as Octavianus. Later he was known as Augustus. Octavian is the Anglicised name given to him like Mark Anotny for Marcus Antonius and thus not his proper Latin name.
Don't always believe what wikipedia says, anyone can write anything in it.
unriggable wrote:Not much I can say about the map exept the fact that those white land pillars need changing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests