Forum

by **qwert** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:32 am

2 is look good ,but put to be normal bold not italic bold

by **ga7** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:58 am

Definitely 3) for small map

by **MR. Nate** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:14 am

I like 3 for both maps.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:04 pm

qwert wrote:2 is look good ,but put to be normal bold not italic bold

I agree with qwert on this one.

Also why didn't you put up a poll? It's much better to keep track and easier for people to express their opinions...

by **Coleman** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:09 pm

If he'd put up a poll he would have likely said something like "1, 2, 3 or 4" and then we'd still get all this mixing numbers comments and the style change one that qwert gave and I also agree with. In addition to what I said previously, either option really.

Polls in the foundry usually turn to rubbish anyway. Too many people vote without looking at anything.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:55 pm

Coleman wrote:If he'd put up a poll he would have likely said something like "1, 2, 3 or 4" and then we'd still get all this mixing numbers comments and the style change one that qwert gave and I also agree with. In addition to what I said previously, either option really.

Polls in the foundry usually turn to rubbish anyway. Too many people vote without looking at anything.

Yes but many people now will not be bothered to vote because they are too lazy to write a reply post, while it's okay for them to click since it's less time consuming. Thus he will get less feedback. Besides, from what did you deduct that people vote in polls without looking at anything?

Also it's impossible to keep track of the votes this way. Polls are there to be used in my humble opinion...

by **Teya** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:41 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:Yes but many people now will not be bothered to vote because they are too lazy to write a reply post

that is so me. But only cos I cant be bothered just replying with a number 2
You gave me a reason to write more.

by **WidowMakers** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:56 pm

Fine I will add a poll Ruben

Some people like two different versions one large one small. I don't want to have two different fonts for the large and the small map.

So vote for the best of both and if you already added another vote for #5

WM

by **edbeard** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:06 pm

I said 3 because it's the only one that I feel is easily readable on both large and small.

I still say 2 on large and 3 on small is optimal and to be frank, I don't see why it's a big deal to have different fonts. But, honestly, it's your revamp and I think you should be able to do it how you want to do it.

by **WidowMakers** on Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:12 pm

edbeard wrote:I said 3 because it's the only one that I feel is easily readable on both large and small.

I still say 2 on large and 3 on small is optimal and to be frank, I don't see why it's a big deal to have different fonts. But, honestly, it's your revamp and I think you should be able to do it how you want to do it.

I just think it looks weird having two very different fonts. I think qwert's idea of getting rid of the italic style of #2 is probably a good idea.

And edbeard. If I felt that because it was my revamp I could do anything i want, then I would not even have changed the font in the first place. I want the community to help decide what the map will look like. There have been many things on my revamps and my own maps that I did not think were important. But the community did and the community is in charge (within reason

)

by **WidowMakers** on Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:12 pm

Here are the updated versions of #2. qwert suggested bold only not bold/italics.

What do you think. Plus based on the poll this style is winning but a close 2nd is #3.