oaktown wrote:tisha, this is looking good. Something weird may have happened to the bottom of the legend on the small map.
I agree - there's a slight difference in shadow on the bottom...
C.
Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
yeti_c wrote:oaktown wrote:tisha, this is looking good. Something weird may have happened to the bottom of the legend on the small map.
I agree - there's a slight difference in shadow on the bottom...
C.
Tisha wrote:yeti_c wrote:oaktown wrote:tisha, this is looking good. Something weird may have happened to the bottom of the legend on the small map.
I agree - there's a slight difference in shadow on the bottom...
C.
i have fixed it..just haven't posted it


natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


edbeard wrote:I think quite a most of your coordinates are still off on the small map. I don't think it's the centering, but the circles themselves. I find that when I resize my map, my army circles become distorted. So, I need to do all my circles twice (once on the large and once on the small).
I'm guessing that this is why this problem is happening. I know it's a pain, but to get everything perfect, this should be done. If I'm wrong and they're just not centered properly, then it's just a matter of redoing the coordinates, but I'm pretty sure it's the circles.
I think if you look at Seabeck, Hood Canal, Camano Island, Everett etc... on the small map you will clearly notice they are off center.
oaktown wrote:I posted earlier that I suspect this map uses army circles that are an odd number of pixels in width and height while the CC numbers are always even: 12x16. Short of recreating all of the army circles they will always look a bit off-center, which is fine really because how often are you going to see a perfectly symmetrical army count on there?
Here's what I'm talking about: note that the third example (23 pix wide) looks exactly like the circles on this map:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests