Moderator: Cartographers
DiM wrote:
2. to make us all realize how really big is world 2.1 and how other maps should be allowed to be bigger.
KEYOGI
Cartography Assistant
If people want to play this map they should be contributing ideas to help qwert work with the foundry and the guidelines, not against them.
If all people want to do is complain about the guidelines, do it in an appropriate place like the The Final Say on Map Size Announcement.
AndyDufresne
Zookeeper & Foundry Foreman
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Posted: 18 Aug 2007 23:47 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For now we are firm standing on our guidelines. Maybe in the future they will change, and we will come back and look at the arguments for and against. Hence the reason this will stay open, so we don't clutter other important threads with the discussion.
KEYOGI wrote:qwert wrote:well like andy say maybe in the future these map be alove to play,so i will work in these map on dimension 850x500,and hope that some day will be open for game.
840 is the absolute maximum.
KEYOGI wrote:qwert wrote:
well like andy say maybe in the future these map be alove to play,so i will work in these map on dimension 850x500,and hope that some day will be open for game.
840 is the absolute maximum.
Okay.
mibi wrote:I think there should be an allowance for epic type maps like this one. They could be 3 sizes, small large and epic. World 2.0 would classify as epic in my book.
DiM wrote:the text is almost impossible to see at this point. imagine how it looks at 630*600
Users browsing this forum: No registered users