Forum

by **gimil** on Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:45 pm

I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!

by **RjBeals** on Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:52 pm

gimil wrote:I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!

Wow. Now thats a quote! Thanks gimil. But you should maybe take a break from cc and get out a little more :wink:

by **gimil** on Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:53 pm

RjBeals wrote:
gimil wrote:I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!

Wow. Now thats a quote! Thanks gimil. But you should maybe take a break from cc and get out a little more

Listen, ive got my prioroties straight :wink:

Thats why the girlfriend had to go . . . .

by **mbs** on Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:35 pm

not sure if anyone else mentioned this... but:

the only thing i can see wrong with DUST BOWL is that there's no big body of water south of las cruces like what is depicted. it's just mexico down there...

by **InkL0sed** on Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:40 pm

mbs wrote:not sure if anyone else mentioned this... but:

the only thing i can see wrong with DUST BOWL is that there's no big body of water south of las cruces like what is depicted. it's just mexico down there...

You have a point, but I don't think it's supposed to water. Probably just dead space.

It's still a valid point even my assertion is true, because it does at least look like water.

by **mbs** on Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:41 pm

InkL0sed wrote:You have a point, but I don't think it's supposed to water. Probably just dead space.

The other dead space is just light tan.

by **rebelman** on Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:25 pm

its no secret that i really like this map. But from experience in a game im currently playing:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1645523

the texas bonus needs to be increased to +7

its currently in effect the same as oaklahoma as texas in reality is +6-3 = 3, oaklahoma is 5-2 = 3 sorry i never flagged this sooner but until it happened to me i never really thought of it

to reward anybody (insane enough) to go for texas it really needs to go from a +6 to a +7 making it a net +4

i know the -1s don't come into effect if you have only 1 man on the terrs but in reality most players would have additional men on these terrs to protect their bonus

by **RjBeals** on Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:23 pm

I hear you rebelman, but I've played a few games where someone started in texas, built his army, took texas and kept it. Built the army and moved straight up. I think you have a valid point, but before a change in bonus is needed, lets wait for any other comments.

edit..
btw, I'm in that game link you posted

and I'm taking Oklahoma next round

by **rebelman** on Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:53 pm

RjBeals wrote:I hear you rebelman, but I've played a few games where someone started in texas, built his army, took texas and kept it. Built the army and moved straight up. I think you have a valid point, but before a change in bonus is needed, lets wait for any other comments.

edit..
btw, I'm in that game link you posted and I'm taking Oklahoma next round

i know you are (and I have been doomed since the start )thanks for the invite and i totally agree a change like i am suggesting should only happen if there is significant support (i could be the lone voice fighting the lone star fight

)

by **RjBeals** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:34 am

mbs wrote:not sure if anyone else mentioned this... but:

the only thing i can see wrong with DUST BOWL is that there's no big body of water south of las cruces like what is depicted. it's just mexico down there...

You know nobody else mentioned this the entire thread. I'm not sure why, except that people probably expected a huge detail like that not to be wrong. Now it bothers me. I may want to "revamp" this map and take the water out.

by **yeti_c** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:39 am

Oops!!

C.

by **RjBeals** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:49 am

yeti_c wrote:Oops!!C.

Seriously... I call to the mods, can I revise the graphics and take out the water and instead fill with the tan sandy "dead" area?

by **yeti_c** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:30 am

RjBeals wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Oops!!C.

Seriously... I call to the mods, can I revise the graphics and take out the water and instead fill with the tan sandy "dead" area?

It's your map - you can change it if you want.

C.

by **RjBeals** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:35 am

It's not mine anymore.

by **yeti_c** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:39 am

RjBeals wrote::?

It's not mine anymore.

I thought that it was...

I'm pretty sure that you're allowed to change anything you want - you can even revoke the right for it to be on the site?

C.

Forum

Dust Bowl [Quenched]

Do you want to have the map changed so Dust territories are given out evenly?

no ocean south of las cruces

Re: no ocean south of las cruces

Re: no ocean south of las cruces

Re: no ocean south of las cruces

Who is online

Give Premium