Conquer Club

Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby sm8900 on Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:52 am

cairnswk wrote:
Joodoo wrote:does that mean if you hold an artillery territory, you can bombard all enemy territories except for Wellington/Napoleon?

Joodoo
Below is part of the xml for the territory M01 - Imperial Guard 1.
As you can see it can bombard a lot of territories that are marked as the opposition.


Code: Select all
<territory>
<name>Imperial Guard 01</name>
<borders>
      </borders>

<bombardments>
<bombardment>Chässe 01</bombardment>
<bombardment>Chässe 02</bombardment>
<bombardment>Chässe 03</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 01</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 02</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 03</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 04</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 05</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 06</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 07</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 08</bombardment>
<bombardment>Clinton 09</bombardment>
<bombardment>Alton 01</bombardment>
<bombardment>Alton 02</bombardment>
<bombardment>Alton 03</bombardment>
<bombardment>Alton 04</bombardment>
<bombardment>Alton 05</bombardment>
<bombardment>Uxbridge 01</bombardment>
<bombardment>Hougomont 01</bombardment>
<bombardment>Hougomont 02</bombardment>
</bombardments>

<coordinates>
<smallx>128</smallx>
<smally>577</smally>
<largex>171</largex>
<largey>762</largey>
</coordinates>
</territory>




wow, quick reply. thanks very much.

not to be nit-picky, but what about the above-quoted post? I didn't see a reply to that one. thanks.
User avatar
Private sm8900
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:26 am

sm8900 wrote:hi. you guys need to post more of the rules for this map. such as that an artillery space can't attack any space which belongs to the the same region as itself.

I have to ask sm8900, when playing a map that is essentially a two-sided game, why would you want to attack your own space.
I can see what you're getting at though.
This was the way the map was designed.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby Incandenza on Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:33 pm

Tho that does give me an idea... since CC still doesn't have proper map guides, it might not be a bad idea to have a FAQ for a given complex map in the first post of the thread (especially since now there's a link to the development thread in each map's game finder image).
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby sm8900 on Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am

cairnswk wrote:
sm8900 wrote:hi. you guys need to post more of the rules for this map. such as that an artillery space can't attack any space which belongs to the the same region as itself.

I have to ask sm8900, when playing a map that is essentially a two-sided game, why would you want to attack your own space.
I can see what you're getting at though.
This was the way the map was designed.


um I would want to attack a space in the same region if it is held by the other side.
User avatar
Private sm8900
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby Capitino on Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:21 am

It looks like Ney04 cannot attack Reille06 at the moment, but it should be able to do so since Ney04 is cavalry and it can therefor attack Reille06 through ImperialGuard08
User avatar
Lieutenant Capitino
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:03 am
Location: +31 71

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby yeti_c on Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:41 am

Capitino wrote:It looks like Ney04 cannot attack Reille06 at the moment, but it should be able to do so since Ney04 is cavalry and it can therefor attack Reille06 through ImperialGuard08


Capitano would appear to have a point here - surprised this has never been spotted before!!!

The current code is as follows:

Code: Select all
   <territory>
      <name>Ney 04</name>
      <borders>
         <border>Ney 05</border>
         <border>Alton 03</border>
         <border>Alton 01</border>
         <border>Clinton 09</border>
         <border>Imperial Guard 08</border>
         <border>Ney 03</border>
         <border>Ney 06</border>
         <border>Alton 02</border>
         <border>Alton 04</border>
         <border>Imperial Guard 07</border>
         <border>Clinton 08</border>
         <border>Clinton 02</border>
         <border>Clinton 03</border>
         <border>Hougomont 02</border>
      </borders>
      <coordinates>
         <smallx>230</smallx>
         <smally>296</smally>
         <largex>308</largex>
         <largey>386</largey>
      </coordinates>


C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:09 pm

yeti_c wrote:
Capitino wrote:It looks like Ney04 cannot attack Reille06 at the moment, but it should be able to do so since Ney04 is cavalry and it can therefor attack Reille06 through ImperialGuard08


Capitano would appear to have a point here - surprised this has never been spotted before!!!
....
C.

Perhaps no-one has tried that attack before.

Anyways, has anyone checked for anything further before i upload this again to MrBenn.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby the.killing.44 on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:14 pm

Well shit, he's right. Update it, cairns.
User avatar
Captain the.killing.44
 
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:24 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:Well shit, he's right. Update it, cairns.


When some has checked if there are no others to be included in the update...perhaps you could take on that task ;)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby the.killing.44 on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:37 pm

cairnswk wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:Well shit, he's right. Update it, cairns.


When some has checked if there are no others to be included in the update...perhaps you could take on that task ;)

I checked the cavalry and didn't see any other errors:

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/Waterloo.xml

Second opinion would be good I presume.
User avatar
Captain the.killing.44
 
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:44 pm

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:44 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

the.killing.44 wrote:Well shit, he's right. Update it, cairns.



When some has checked if there are no others to be included in the update...perhaps you could take on that task ;)


I checked the cavalry and didn't see any other errors:

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/Waterloo.xml

Second opinion would be good I presume.



Thanks .44
Yes a second opinion would be good.
Last edited by cairnswk on Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby samuelc812 on Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:39 am

Was just about to report this, but i see someone has already done so. I deployed on N04 and assumed i would be able to assault R06 from N04 but the option was unavailable to me...

Good to know you're already sorting this out.

~Sam
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:40 pm

lackattack wrote:waterloo has been updated :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby yeti_c on Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:41 pm

cairnswk wrote:
lackattack wrote:waterloo has been updated :)


Nice work Cairns.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby MrBenn on Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:19 pm

yeti_c wrote:
cairnswk wrote:
lackattack wrote:waterloo has been updated :)


Nice work Cairns.

C.

Somebody beat me to posting the notification... Cheers for getting this done expeditiously ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby the.killing.44 on Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:36 pm

Can I get a XML medal now :lol:
User avatar
Captain the.killing.44
 
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby yeti_c on Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:29 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:Can I get a XML medal now :lol:


No

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby the.killing.44 on Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:48 pm

yeti_c wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:Can I get a XML medal now :lol:


No

C.

:roll:
User avatar
Captain the.killing.44
 
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby Extraterrestrial on Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:41 am

I have complaint about this game. You need to make it so that if player is stuck in Artillary and cant move out then the game automatically ends with the win going to the player who is in other regions. because game 6404825 this idiot keeps deploying on board and wont take the 1 guy I have in an artillary region and finish the game. So I cant play the game because I cant move and so theres no more point in game to continue. So it should be auto-finish when game gets to a point like that.
User avatar
Captain Extraterrestrial
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: AREA FIFTY-ONE

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby natty dread on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:14 am

Your opponent is breaking the rules by holding you hostage, report him in C&A...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby yeti_c on Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:16 pm

Just Deadbeat out.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby Evil DIMwit on Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:08 am

I'm in my first game on this map right now. It is absolutely beautiful gameplay-wise! Well done, cairns.
ImageImage
User avatar
Captain Evil DIMwit
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby Bärsärk on Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:51 am

Greatest map I´ve ever played. Thanks!
Cook Bärsärk
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:32 pm

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby skillfusniper33 on Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:15 pm

This would be weird if there is an issue with the XML, but are people really supposed to get 3 bonuses for holding 3 villages?

I thought if you held all 3 villages then it would counteract the holding of 2 villages

here's a screenshot
Click image to enlarge.
image
Image
Place: 267 Score: 2630
User avatar
Major skillfusniper33
 
Posts: 835
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:48 pm
Location: Washington

Re: Battle of Waterloo [Quenched]

Postby MrBenn on Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:16 pm

skillfusniper33 wrote:This would be weird if there is an issue with the XML, but are people really supposed to get 3 bonuses for holding 3 villages?


The 3 Villages does override the any 2 village bonuses:
Code: Select all
<continent>
   <name>All Three Villages</name>
   <bonus>7</bonus>
   <components>
      <territory>Chapel S Lambert 01</territory>
      <territory>Chapel S Lambert 02</territory>
      <territory>Mont St Jean 01</territory>
      <territory>Mont St Jean 02</territory>
      <territory>Plancenoit 01</territory>
      <territory>Plancenoit 02</territory>
   </components>
   <overrides>
      <override>Any Two Villages</override>
   </overrides>
</continent>


The glitch you are seeing is related to the way BOB displays the bonuses you (or your opponent) hold
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users