Forum

by **MrBenn** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:34 pm

The problem was caused by a slight change in the territory order in the XML. A corrected version of the XML has been submitted to lackattack, and will be uploaded as soon as he gets it.

Thanks for your patience,

MrBenn ;-)

by **LED ZEPPELINER** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:16 pm

MrBenn wrote:This is probably due to a change in the order the territories are listed in the new XML...

Also, when u attack oxon on the new map, where u select which place u want to attack, it has oxfordshire instead of oxon, and this probably happened to other places as well

by **the.killing.44** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:19 pm

LED ZEPPELINER wrote:
MrBenn wrote:This is probably due to a change in the order the territories are listed in the new XML...

Also, when u attack oxon on the new map, where u select which place u want to attack, it has oxfordshire instead of oxon, and this probably happened to other places as well

Look at the key … Oxon = Oxfordshire

.44

by **MrBenn** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:40 pm

This is a discussion that can take place in the map thread in the Final Forge...

[tannoy for a global moderator...]

by **mrblitz** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:41 pm

I went from really liking this map, to not wanting to play it. The colors are all washed out. There is little contrast between the lettering and the background. The entire thing is 'whitish.'

The old one was great.

by **pinkflaminko** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:50 pm

why is the british isles map changed? it was perfect, just for the sake of improving? it looks better but there was nothing wrong, i will miss the old british isles

by **Ryall55** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:57 pm

Havent played on the revamped map, but I love the way it looks

by **ahunda** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:12 pm

It´s fixed now, and all armies are back to where they are supposed to be.

Thanks.

by **The Fuzzy Pengui** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:19 pm

Moving per MrBenn's request

by **soundman** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:05 pm

mrblitz wrote:I went from really liking this map, to not wanting to play it. The colors are all washed out. There is little contrast between the lettering and the background. The entire thing is 'whitish.'

The old one was great.

I agree that it is too pale, but it's not bad when you get the armies on it.

It's also easier to tell where the territory borders are than on the old one.

by **stringybeany** on Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:48 am

Very nice job!

In case no one has yet mentioned (very long thread), "oxon" is still listed as "oxfordshire" in the xml.

by **gimil** on Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:35 am

stringybeany wrote:Very nice job!

In case no one has yet mentioned (very long thread), "oxon" is still listed as "oxfordshire" in the xml.

Thats the intention

by **niMic** on Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:01 am

Honestly, I preferred the old British Isles.

by **_big_easy_** on Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:44 pm

Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?

Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.

And you wonder why you're losing members....

by **RjBeals** on Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:46 pm

_big_easy_ wrote:Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?

Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.

And you wonder why you're losing members....

I think overall more users like the revamp over the original. There's the nostalgia thing to get over, but the old one got many many complaints on how hard it was to tell borders.