Europa [Quenched]

[Ogrecrusher]

No offense to you, but I don't think it needs a revamp. First off (again, no offense) but i think that this one isn't as good as the first. There isn't Africa or Middle East, but yet there is Georgia and Armenia.....I like how the bonuses are divided up better, but the first map seems less squeezed, and better looking.

This is a first draft and I'd already rather play it than the awful other one. Georgia and Armenia play football in Europe, although I'm not sure what the actual defnition of a country being in Europe is...

[Chirondom]

No offense to you, but I don't think it needs a revamp. First off (again, no offense) but i think that this one isn't as good as the first. There isn't Africa or Middle East, but yet there is Georgia and Armenia.....I like how the bonuses are divided up better, but the first map seems less squeezed, and better looking.

This isn't a revamp, it's a different map.

[jnd94]

No offense to you, but I don't think it needs a revamp. First off (again, no offense) but i think that this one isn't as good as the first. There isn't Africa or Middle East, but yet there is Georgia and Armenia.....I like how the bonuses are divided up better, but the first map seems less squeezed, and better looking.

This isn't a revamp, it's a different map.

Europe 2.0? That sounds like a re-vamp to me.....

[Ogrecrusher]

No offense to you, but I don't think it needs a revamp. First off (again, no offense) but i think that this one isn't as good as the first. There isn't Africa or Middle East, but yet there is Georgia and Armenia.....I like how the bonuses are divided up better, but the first map seems less squeezed, and better looking.

This isn't a revamp, it's a different map.

Europe 2.0? That sounds like a re-vamp to me.....

It's not a revamp because the original is going to exist in tandem with this one.

[tim02]

Here's my idea. Look at the continents on the Italian, British, French, Iberian, etc., maps. Use those continents and turn them into territories. Then make owning all those territories into a sub-continent, a la World 2.0.

Otherwise, this map isn't really all that different from the first Europe map.

I disagree as much as possible.

The whole point of this one is to ad all the countries, adding any provinces would make it stupid.

Only the islands are an exeption because they make the game play better, especialy the islands in the north, and the med, those are actually very important to game play.

And the whole thing in the british island is also helpful to game play, I like that continent, this first draft/first ever map is amazing and I would just like to say I back this map completly. (and that's alot coming from a picky player like me!)


Well done and Good luck

[AndyDufresne]

The 2.0 probably shouldn't be a part of title, for any confusion.


--Andy

[sfhbballnut]

has it been discussed to have this as a europe map and the current europe map as something else?, the current europe map is an excellent map that I would hate to see go, but I'd also like to see where this one goes

[Heimdall]

I think The Balkans countries are too small.

Those people should merge into one country and call it Yugoslavia or something.

[tim02]

has it been discussed to have this as a europe map and the current europe map as something else?, the current europe map is an excellent map that I would hate to see go, but I'd also like to see where this one goes

I think they should both stay, I love the old Europe map, and I have already grown on this, this could have some great gameplay some of the best, the islands, the continents, all that needs doing is the graphics, which after this first draft I bet well be great.

Don't let me down


And for the post above by hamdall that is pointless and ruins the entire point of this map I disagree.

Again don't let me down

Tim

[MrBenn]

This is a first draft and I'd already rather play it than the awful other one. Georgia and Armenia play football in Europe, although I'm not sure what the actual defnition of a country being in Europe is...

http://worldatlas.com/cntycont.htm

I used the WorldAtlas.com site and the United Nations sites to get the list of 'recognised' countries.

[Hrvat]

I think The Balkans countries are too small.

Those people should merge into one country and call it Yugoslavia or something.

Yogoslavia does not exist, in Europe or anywhere else

[Jesse710]

It's really hard to see some of the teritory names

[MarVal]

I think The Balkans countries are too small.

Those people should merge into one country and call it Yugoslavia or something.

Yogoslavia does not exist, in Europe or anywhere else

Yes, I agree with Hrvat.

I'm glad we now have a map thats been developed with all the countries and the real names of Europe countries in it.

Not just like the current "Europe" map with strange names like "Germany" as a continent and continent "Scandinavia" with the countries Estonia and Saint Petersburg, and "Belgium" as one country in the area with the Netherlands and Luxembourg!?

I think this is a great idea and it looks amazing on your first start

And about the Microstates (or ministates) as Andorra, Vatican City, Liechtenstein, Malta , San Marino and Monaco, you can maybe give it a number or letter and then in a legend of the Microstates you can place the names in it. Just a suggestion and maybe you can give them bonuses for holding 2, 3 for or more Microstates.

See also the European microstates (very small sovereign states) on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_microstates

And if you need a helping hand, just let me know.

Grtz
Marval
Cartographer of the BeNeLux

[qwert]

I complete support these map,and for old Europe map,maybe you dont notice,but these old map present Europe before 1990,because you have some country who now not exist(Western Germany,Eastern Germany,Chehoslovakia,Croatia(these will be change in Yugoslavia),so you can not compare old Europe map with new Europe 2.0 because these not same.

[tim02]

And you need to decide which continents Turkey and Russia go to.