Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
lanyards wrote:Well, maybe the font, and the star looks stretched a little. It doesn't look that bad actually now. But the names under are hard to read.
--lanyards
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:fireedud wrote:gimil wrote:cicero wrote:On both sizes.
Of the two horizontal lines dividing up the legend the lower of the two seems to be a few pixels too high in that it is not equidistant from the two elements of legend it separates.
The higher of the two does appear to be equidistant from the two elements of legend it separates. And is more satisfying for that I think?
Yeti can you translate that to non geek?
He's saying that the line between All spaces can attack adjacent spaces and Two rows may not share more than one space is too high.
Thanks


natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
rocky mountain wrote:can you explain something?
under where it says "two rows may not share more than one space" what does it mean by the = and not = signs? why is 4 good and 2 bad? i thought 1 was good and 2 or 3 was bad... i don't understand what it's trying to say... its kind of confusing...
rocky mountain wrote:for the bonuses, does it have to be those exact shapes, or is it like 1 row for 2, 2 rows for 4, 3 rows for 6, 4 rows for 8, and 5 rows for 10? i'm asuming its the last one, but not sure...
rocky mountain wrote:by the way, this might be an even quicker forge than luxembourg... good job.

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Androidz wrote:I think the numbers is to small kinda blends into the background a bit.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests