
Any better with the bevel?
Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
ZeakCytho wrote:Better, but I think it could still be a bit stronger.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:Better, but I think it could still be a bit stronger.
its such a thin font if I do much more it wont work.
ZeakCytho wrote:gimil wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:Better, but I think it could still be a bit stronger.
its such a thin font if I do much more it wont work.
The title font is thin? It looks thick to me; or, at least, it's thick at the size used in the title.
I feel like the title should either be raised out above the "board" or etched into it, like words on a real plastic or metal game board would be, rather than just written on, as one could do on a board with a paper surface.
But, if you say that it looks bad with more bevel, then I'll defer to your judgment.
Did you try embossing it yet? Maybe a sunken/etched look will work better than a raised one.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
yeti_c wrote:I think we need to have "Each Line +2" or similar somewhere...
C.

gimil wrote:4. Seems like alot of leg work for little gain. I keep it on the back burner if I need the space later on. Sorry cairns but its to much work for the sake of a little eye space
cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:4. Seems like alot of leg work for little gain. I keep it on the back burner if I need the space later on. Sorry cairns but its to much work for the sake of a little eye space
Mmmm...that's exactly what design work is all about gimil...a lot of work for sometimes little gain, but the end overall effect is worth it.
Happy that you'll keep it on the backburner but i think that the bonus column needs to run the entire right side of the board and the title can be constricted to 3/4s of the board. Only my opinion.Your map however, you do what you want.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:
Any better with the bevel?

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:4. Seems like alot of leg work for little gain. I keep it on the back burner if I need the space later on. Sorry cairns but its to much work for the sake of a little eye space
Mmmm...that's exactly what design work is all about gimil...a lot of work for sometimes little gain, but the end overall effect is worth it.
Happy that you'll keep it on the backburner but i think that the bonus column needs to run the entire right side of the board and the title can be constricted to 3/4s of the board. Only my opinion.Your map however, you do what you want.
Im happy to shift about the title area for more space for the legends thou, rather than the buttons

yeti_c wrote:Am I being really dim - but can either of you two explain what the hell you mean by "buttons"?!
C.
yeti_c wrote:gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:4. Seems like alot of leg work for little gain. I keep it on the back burner if I need the space later on. Sorry cairns but its to much work for the sake of a little eye space
Mmmm...that's exactly what design work is all about gimil...a lot of work for sometimes little gain, but the end overall effect is worth it.
Happy that you'll keep it on the backburner but i think that the bonus column needs to run the entire right side of the board and the title can be constricted to 3/4s of the board. Only my opinion.Your map however, you do what you want.
Im happy to shift about the title area for more space for the legends thou, rather than the buttons
Am I being really dim - but can either of you two explain what the hell you mean by "buttons"?!
C.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest