Moderator: Cartographers
Warning wrote:This post may contain trace elements of irony.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
thenobodies80 wrote:
I'm not a advertising man in real life, but i think that your images and the RJ answer are saying the same thing:
The first image is intentionally (like the map) less flashy.
The creators want that you'll see the beer first and then you'll see the wonderful big hand trying to take it.
In the map you'll see the impassable in a second and then you will search what they mean in the rest of the map.
The impassable text is visible, so you'll find the borders, a bit camouflaged in the trees.
The second image you posted is obviously more flashy.
But if RJ will change the colors, the actual problem is only reversed on the map, like in the orange or yellow example.
Visible on legend, horrible on map.
I'm of the opinion that is better to spend a second searching the impassable explaination than destroy the actual wonderful look of this map.
The map is perfect !
Nice work RJ!
thenobodies80
gimil wrote:An alternative would be to slap a little contrasting glow or something around the unpassable legends part. To be honest though i am not sure this is a grave concern. People will see the 'unpassable' text, see the image next to it and put 2+2 together.
Streching the imagination the only concern that may arise is with colourblind people would may not be able to see it at all. I doubt this will happen however.
RjBeals wrote:where were you people a month ago?
RjBeals wrote:where were you people a month ago?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users